The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Bargaining Problem
Abstract
A new treatment is presented of a classical economic problem, one which occurs in many forms, as bargaining, bilateral monopoly, etc. It may also be regarded as a nonzero-sum two-person game. In this treatment a few general assumptions are made concerning the behavior of a single individual and of a group of two individuals in certain economic environments. From these, the solution (in the sense of this paper) of classical problem may be obtained. In the terms of game theory, values are found for the game. См. также: Two-person cooperative games, автор - Джо Нэш.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Search-Theoretic Models of the Labor Market: A Survey
Rogerson, R., Shimer, R., & Wright, R. (2005) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205105775362014 · Cited by 1,051
Dominant resource fairness: fair allocation of multiple resource types
Ghodsi, A., Zaharia, M., Hindman, B., Konwinski, A., Shenker, S. J., & Stoica, I. G. (2011) · doi:10.5555/1972457.1972490 · Cited by 1,049
Bubbles, Crashes, and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets
Suchanek, G. L., & Williams, A. W. (1991) · Papers in Experimental Economics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528354.022 · Cited by 916
The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View
Tuomela, R. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001 · Cited by 840
An updated survey of GA-based multiobjective optimization techniques
Coello, C. A. (2000) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/358923.358929 · Cited by 773
Metadata
- Authors
- Nash, J. F.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1950-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017990047
- Cited by
- 7,840
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Bargaining Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1907266
- The paper
- Nash, J. F. (1950). The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
