Annual Survey of Economic Theory: The Theory of Monopoly
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The omission to explicitly demand or incentivize tougher competition between portfolio firms may allow managers to enjoy a quiet life and thus cause an equilibrium with reduced competition and sustained high margins.
“the omission to explicitly demand or incentivize tougher competition between portfolio firms may allow managers to enjoy a”
From Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership (2018) · cites this paper as Hicks, 1935
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership
AZAR, J., SCHMALZ, M. C., & TECU, I. (2018) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12698 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Market power and rents in global supply chains
Swinnen, J. F. M., & Vandeplas, A. (2010) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00493.x · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Corporate Governance and Costs of Equity: Theory and Evidence
Li, D., & Li, E. X. N. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2570 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hicks, J. R.
- Corresponding author
- Hicks, J. R.
- ORCID
- Hicks, J. R.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1935-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2319504626
- Cited by
- 1,039
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 62 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Econometrica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- monopoly, market power, price discrimination, oligopoly
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
