The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Least Squares Correction for Selectivity Bias
Abstract
WHEN ESTIMATING REGRESSION MODELS it is very nearly always assumed that the sample is random. The recent literature has begun to deal with the problems which arise when estimating a regression model with samples which may not be random. The most general case in which one only has access to a single nonrandom sample has not been addressed since it is a very imposing problem. The case which has been addressed starts with a random sample but considers the problem of missing values for the dependent variable of a regression. If the determination of which values are to be observed is related to the unobservable error term in the regression, then methods such as ordinary least squares are in general inappropriate. By constructing a joint model which represents both the regression model to be estimated and the process determining when the dependent variable is to be observed, some progress can be made towards taking into account nonrandomness for the observed values of the dependent variable. The actual techniques employed fall into two rough groups, full information maximum likelihood models, and limited information methods which are more easily estimated. In the full information category are two methods. One model combines the probit and the normal regression models, and the other combines the Tobit or limited dependent variable model with the normal regression model. The form of the probit regression model is
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor Supply
Heckman, J. (1974) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913937 · Cited by 1,852
Cited by
A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values
Little, R. J. A. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722 · Cited by 8,963
Amemiya, T. (1984) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(84)90074-5 · Cited by 1,520
A Comparison of Alternative Models for the Demand for Medical Care
Duan, N., Manning, W. G., Morris, C. N., & Newhouse, J. P. (1983) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.1983.10509330 · Cited by 1,292
Ethnic Enclaves and the Economic Success of Immigrants--Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Edin, P.-A., Fredriksson, P., & Aslund, O. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/00335530360535225 · Cited by 940
The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the US Manufacturing Sector
Hall, B. H. (1987) · The Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.2307/2098589 · Cited by 851
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, R. J.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1980-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1815
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016983945
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Least Squares Correction for Selectivity Bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1911938
- The paper
- Olsen, R. J. (1980). A Least Squares Correction for Selectivity Bias. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.