Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 708

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Testing the Quantity-Quality Fertility Model: The Use of Twins as a Natural Experiment

Rosenzweig, Mark R., Wolpin, Kenneth I.·1980·Econometrica

Abstract

The predictive content of the quantity-quality model of fertility and the empirical information required for verification under a minimal set of restrictions on the utility function is described. It is demonstrated that commodity-independent compensated price effects must be known to infer the existence of the unobservable interdependent shadow prices of the model with a relatively weak structure improsed on preference orderings. A method of using multiple birth events to substitute for these exogenous prices is proposed and applied to household data from India.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1912026

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 708

Metadata

Authors
Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I.
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1980-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
227
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980801036
Cited by
708
References
0
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the Quantity-Quality Fertility Model: The Use of Twins as a Natural Experiment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1912026
The paper
Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I. (1980). Testing the Quantity-Quality Fertility Model: The Use of Twins as a Natural Experiment. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912026

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.