The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Computationally Efficient Quadrature Procedure for the One-Factor Multinomial Probit Model
Abstract
A PROBLEM OF ESTIMATION that has long confronted many economists is the difficulty of estimating the parameters of equations with limited dependent variables on cross-section time-series (i.e., panel) data. While there are widely available packaged computer programs for estimating either (a) cross-section probit and Tobit models or (b) simple permanent-transitory, random-effects panel models with continuous dependent variables, there are no available computationally feasible methods of combining these two models. This is because the likelihood function that arises in such a combined model contains multivariate normal integrals whose evaluation is quite difficult, if not impossible, with conventional approximation methods. There is a widespread feeling among those working in the area that one possible method of evaluation, the use of quadrature techniques, is in principle possible but is in practice computationally too burdensome to consider (e.g., Albright et al. [2, p. 13]; Hausman and Wise [6, p. 12]). In this note we point out that this is true only of standard quadrature techniques such as trapezoidal integration or its improved variants; Gaussian quadrature, on the other hand, is extremely efficient and is well within the bounds of computational feasibility on modern computers. In what follows, we state the nature of the integrals that need to be evaluated, provide a brief exposition of Gaussian quadrature, and provide a numerical illustration of its use in
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Greatest of a Finite Set of Random Variables
Clark, C. E. (1961) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.9.2.145 · Cited by 708
Cited by
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis
Gulati, R. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393756 · Cited by 2,664
Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behavior
Aitken, B., Hanson, G. H., & Harrison, A. E. (1997) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/s0022-1996(96)01464-x · Cited by 1,159
Inequality, the Urban-Rural Gap, and Migration*
Young, A. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjt025 · Cited by 511
Shields, M. A., & Price, S. W. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2005.00361.x · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, J. S., & Moffitt, R.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 761
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988644013
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Computationally Efficient Quadrature Procedure for the One-Factor Multinomial Probit Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1912613
- The paper
- Butler, J. S., & Moffitt, R. (1982). A Computationally Efficient Quadrature Procedure for the One-Factor Multinomial Probit Model. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.