Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,310

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Alternative Tests of Independence between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances

Wu, De-Min·1973·Econometrica

Abstract

IN TESTING HYPOTHESES on the coefficients of a linear regression model with stochastic regressors it is well known that the usual t test and F test are applicable if the stochastic regressors are statistically independent of the disturbances [3, p. 268; 5, pp. 27-28]. Also, there are cases in which economic hypotheses can be stated in terms of the independence of stochastic regressors and disturbances, the best known examples being the current versus the permanent income hypotheses and the recursiveness hypothesis in a simultaneous equations model. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a procedure that can be used to test the hypothesis that the stochastic regressors and disturbances are independent. In this paper, we examine four alternative tests of independence between the stochastic regressors and disturbances. In the rest of this section we specify the stochastic model and state the hypotheses to be tested. In Section 2 we present two finite sample tests. In Section 3 two alternative asymptotic tests are given and asymptotic power functions of all four tests are examined. In Section 4 we give examples of applications of the test in econometrics. We consider the following linear model:

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1914093

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,310

Metadata

Authors
Wu, D.-M.
Venue
Econometrica
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1973-07
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
733
ISSN
0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086652341
Cited by
1,310
References
0
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative Tests of Independence between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1914093
The paper
Wu, D.-M. (1973). Alternative Tests of Independence between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914093

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.