The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Informational Equilibrium
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The initial marginal cost of mimicking is therefore zero in the con fi dence application. As demonstrated in Section 3 of Riley (1979, pp. 340 -341), this simply requires that the signaling schedule b ( a ) exhibit a vertical tangent at the lower bound, cleanly yielding a strictly monotonic separating schedule.”
From Talking the talk, not walking the walk: The coevolution of overconfidence and loss aversion (2026) · cites this paper as Riley (1979)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Talking the talk, not walking the walk: The coevolution of overconfidence and loss aversion
Dawson, C., & de Meza, D. (2026) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000644 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Riley, J. G.
- Corresponding author
- Riley, John G.
- ORCID
- Riley, John G.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1979-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4245156943
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Econometrica (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- informational equilibrium, information economics, equilibrium theory, information asymmetry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Informational Equilibrium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1914187
- The paper
- Riley, J. G. (1979). Informational Equilibrium. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914187
