The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Productivity and Technical Change
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind
Abramovitz, M. (1986) · The Journal of Economic History · doi:10.1017/s0022050700046209 · Cited by 3,512
Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata
Bartelsman, E. J., & Doms, M. (2000) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.38.3.569 · Cited by 1,632
Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Trilemma of the Service Economy
Iversen, T., & Wren, A. (1998) · World Politics · doi:10.1017/s0043887100007358 · Cited by 989
The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies
Mowery, D., & Rosenberg, N. (1979) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(79)90019-2 · Cited by 819
National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1994) · Economics of Innovation and New Technology · doi:10.1080/10438599400000004 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Solow, R. M., & Salter, W. E. G.
- Venue
- The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1962-11
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 501
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968246370
- Cited by
- 836
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Productivity and Technical Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1926674
- The paper
- Solow, R. M., & Salter, W. E. G. (1962). Productivity and Technical Change. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926674
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
