The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Child-Care Costs and Family Labor Supply
Abstract
This paper presents a theoretical and empirical analysis of the effects of child care costs on family labor supply and the demand for market child care. The model is a framework for cross-section estimation of the effects of child care costs on labor supply and child care use. It applies to households having young children requiring continuous care and in which both the mother and 1 other potential child care provider are present. The 3 potential sources of child care are the mother the potential informal provider and the market. Using data from the 1980 baseline household survey of the Employment Opportunity Pilot Projects this empirical analysis uses a subsample of 6170 households in which there is a married woman under age 45 with her spouse present at the time of the survey at least 1 child under age 14 and nonmissing data on key variables. Results show that 1) higher market child care costs discourage women from working even when an informal source of care is available indicating that such informal care is an imperfect substitute for market care; 2) a higher wage rate for the mother encourages her to work thus a higher wage rate increases the probability of using market child care; 3) the number of children requiring care has a negative impact on the probability of the women working with the largest impact caused by younger children; 4) nonwage income has a negative impact on the probability of the woman working; and 5) black women are more likely to work than whites and are statistically more likely than whites to use market child care if they do work. This family labor supply model predicts that the cost of market child care will affect household decisions on labor supply and child care use. Estimates of a qualitative choice model provide strong confirmation that child care costs affect such decisions. The responsiveness of the labor supply of mothers to child care costs demonstrated in this study indicate that such subsidies do have their intended effect of encouraging labor supply. The fact that a large proportion of current child care subsidies benefit primarily middle and upper income families via the income tax credit suggests that the labor supply effets of such subsidies may in practice be stronger for less needy families than for low income families. Employer-subsidized child care may become an increasingly popular tool for attracting mothers into the labor force.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fertility and Women's Employment in Industrialized Nations
Brewster, K. L., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.271 · Cited by 902
Adda, J., Dustmann, C., & Stevens, K. (2017) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/690952 · Cited by 467
Public Schooling for Young Children and Maternal Labor Supply
Gelbach, J. B. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802760015748 · Cited by 465
Child Care Costs as a Barrier to Employment for Single and Married Mothers
Kimmel, J. (1998) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465398557384 · Cited by 342
Child care availability and first-birth timing in Norway
Rindfuss, R. R., Guilkey, D., Morgan, S. P., Kravdal, Ø., & Guzzo, K. B. (2007) · Demography · doi:10.1353/dem.2007.0017 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Blau, D. M., & Robins, P. K.
- Venue
- The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 374
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986327626
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Child-Care Costs and Family Labor Supply. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1926774
- The paper
- Blau, D. M., & Robins, P. K. (1988). Child-Care Costs and Family Labor Supply. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.