The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach
Abstract
Rolf Faere, Shawna Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell, Carl Pasurka, Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 71, No. 1 (Feb., 1989), pp. 90-98
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/res016 · Cited by 1,928
Coelli, T., & Perelman, S. (1999) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00271-9 · Cited by 666
Evaluating economic and environmental efficiency of global airlines: A SBM-DEA approach
Chang, Y.-T., Park, H.-S., Jeong, J.-B., & Lee, J.-W. (2014) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.013 · Cited by 222
Twum, F. A., Long, X., Salman, M., Mensah, C. N., Kankam, W. A., & Tachie, A. K. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-12130-y · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Faere, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C.
- Venue
- The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098940796
- Cited by
- 1,895
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1928055
- The paper
- Faere, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
