The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I
Abstract
In an earlier paper (Preston 1948) we found that, in a sufficiently large aggregation of individuals of many species, the individuals often tended to be distributed among the species according to a lognormal law. We plotted as abscissa equal increments in the logarithms of the number of individuals representing a species, and as ordinate the number of species falling into each of these increments. We found it convenient to use as such increments the octave, that is the interval in which representation doubled, so that our abscissae became simply a scale of octaves, but this choice of unit is arbitrary. Whatever logarithmic unit is used, the graph tended to take the form of a normal or Gaussian curve, so that the distribution was lognormal. \Ve called this the Species Curve. In the present paper we take up a point inerely mentioned in 1948 that not only is the distribution lognormal, but the constants or parameters seem to be restricted in a peculiar way. They are not fixed, but they are interlocked. The nature of this restriction and interlocking is the main theme of the present paper. In the earlier paper we graduated the experimental results with curves of the form
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues
LIMPERT, E., STAHEL, W. A., & ABBT, M. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:lndats]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,621
MACARTHUR, R. H. (1965) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1965.tb00815.x · Cited by 1,454
Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis
Fahrig, L. (2013) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12130 · Cited by 1,408
Computational Improvements Reveal Great Bacterial Diversity and High Metal Toxicity in Soil
Gans, J., Wolinsky, M., & Dunbar, J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1112665 · Cited by 1,207
The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat
Atmar, W., & Patterson, B. D. (1993) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00317508 · Cited by 1,050
Metadata
- Authors
- Preston, F. W.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1962-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119556443
- Cited by
- 1,808
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1931976
- The paper
- Preston, F. W. (1962). The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931976
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.