Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Ecological Significance of Evergreenness

Monk, Carl D.·1966·Ecology

Abstract

Percentage of evergreenness in 158 forest stands from seven community types in north—central Florida ranged from 0 to 100. In general, the evergreen species are more important on dry sterile sites and the deciduous species on mesic fertile sites. Nine environmental variables or combinations of variables accounted for approximately 51% of the variation in stand evergreenness. The segregation of evergreen species to dry sterile sites may be related to the gradual return of nutrients to the soil or the establishment of a more closed mineral cycle through (1) the leaching of nutrients from leaves and (2) year—round leaf fall.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1932995

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Monk, C. D.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1966-05
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
504-505
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2086794124
Cited by
369
References
0
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Ecological Significance of Evergreenness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1932995
The paper
Monk, C. D. (1966). An Ecological Significance of Evergreenness. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932995

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.