The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of Allochthonous Detritus in the Trophic Structure of a Woodland Springbrook Community
Abstract
The community trophic structure of Morgan's Creek, Meade County, Kentucky was analyzed through regular measurement of standing crops of the chief potential sources of plant materials available to the animals (suspended particulate, attached particulate, and allochthonous leaf materials) and an examination of their gut contents. The most important food was allochthonous leaf materials, which occurred as suspended material in the water, as a component of materials attached to the streambed, and as whole leaves and fragments. Diatoms were the only other important source of plant materials and constituted the greatest proportion of the attached organic fraction. Mean standing crop measurements of potential foods for five sampling stations ranged from 0.6 to 1.0 kcal/m 3 for suspended particulate organic matter; 12 to 19 kcal/m 2 for attached particulate organic matter; and 4.7 to 13 kcal/m 2 for allochthonous leaf materials. Comparison of standing crop data with previous findings indicates that the values generally are within the known ranges for flowing waters. Analysis of gut contents and determination of the principal pathways of energy flow in the stream indicate that imported organic matter in the form of allochthonous leaf materials provides the main source of energy for the primary consumers and, indirectly, for the entire benthic community of Morgan's Creek. Of the 37 taxa of animals studied, 24 were herbivores, 5 omnivores, and 8 carnivores. In general, detritus made up from 50 to 100% of all the materials ingested by both the herbivores and omnivores. The total number of benthic animals was comprised of 14% herbivores, 83% omnivores, and 3% carnivores. Gammarus minus was the single most important member of the fauna. It contributed 81% of the total number of invertebrates, and well over 90% of its diet consisted of allochthonous leaf detritus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
Polis, G. A., Anderson, W. B., & Holt, R. D. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.289 · Cited by 2,362
Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems
Cummins, K. W. (1974) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1296676 · Cited by 1,413
A review of allochthonous organic matter dynamics and metabolism in streams
Tank, J. L., Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Griffiths, N. A., Entrekin, S. A., & Stephen, M. L. (2010) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/08-170.1 · Cited by 760
Marcarelli, A. M., Baxter, C. V., Mineau, M. M., & Hall, R. O. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-2240.1 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Mninshall, G. W.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1967-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-149
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2119545319
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Allochthonous Detritus in the Trophic Structure of a Woodland Springbrook Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1933425
- The paper
- Mninshall, G. W. (1967). Role of Allochthonous Detritus in the Trophic Structure of a Woodland Springbrook Community. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.