Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 446

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reconstructing Forest History from Live and Dead Plant Material‐‐An Approach to the Study of Forest Succession in Southwest New Hampshire

Henry, J. D., Swan, J. M. A.·1974·Ecology

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to see if it is possible to determine the course of forest succession over several hundred years by the dissection and close scrutiny of live and dead plant material. The study area was a one—tenth—acre (0.04—ha) square plot in a forest that had never been cut, located near Ashuelot in southwestern New Hampshire. Within it stem—location and growth—rate data were collected from three different classes of stems: 1) living trees, 2), dead unburied stems and stem fragments, and 3), woody remnants buried in the forest floor. The vegetational history of the plot was reconstructed from before 1665 to 1967. During this time, autogenic succession did not contribute significantly to compositional changes, whereas disturbance was an important mediator of such changes. Furthermore, changes in forest structure were often manifestations of species behavior: each tree species had a distinctive stem—distribution pattern in relation to microtopography, mode of germination, and growth. The approach seemed to provide a useful means to obtain evidence about forest change through time that may help prediction and illuminate ecological theory. Limits and modifications of the procedure are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1934413

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Henry, J. D., & Swan, J. M. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1974-07
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
772-783
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2103536388
Cited by
446
References
0
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.