The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Territory and Breeding Density in the Great Tit, Parus Major L.
Abstract
This paper describes an investigation into whether or not spring territorial behavior was limiting the breeding density of a population of Great Tits on Wytham Estate, near Oxford. The analysis of distances between neighboring nests showed that nest sites were more spaced out than would be expected from a random distribution; this indicated that interactions between the birds produced at least a local density—limiting effect. In 2 successive years, established territorial pairs were removed from a stable spring population in mixed woodland. The removed birds were rapidly replaced by new pairs. These newcomers were largely first—year birds; they came from territories in the hedgerows that surrounded the wood; the vacated hedgerow territories were not refilled. The hedgerows were found to be suboptimal in terms of reproductive success. Thus territory limited the breeding density in the optimal habitat. Song advertisement is probably important in maintaining territorial boundaries, hedgerow birds being able to detect the presence of individual woodland territory holders by recognizing their songs. The effect of winter food supply on the population was investigated by supplying excess food throughout one winter. This artificial food supplement appeared to have no effect on the number of Great Tits breeding in the wood, but did produce an increase in the case of a related species, the Blue Tit. The results show that territorial behavior influences density; this is not considered to be a function of territory in the evolutionary sense, but rather a consequence of spacing out that has been selected for in some other context. A possible advantage of spacing out in the Great Tit is as a defense against predators. Territory size varies considerably from year to year. These variations are the result of interactions between the birds themselves, rather than direct adjustments of territory size to fluctuations in some environmental resource. Even though territory has an effect on the number of birds breeding in the wood,it is not an important density—dependent factor acting to regulate the population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization
Bolnick, D. I., Svanbäck, R., Fordyce, J. A., Yang, L. H., Davis, J. M., Hulsey, C. D., & Forister, M. L. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/343878 · Cited by 2,762
Food As A Limit On Breeding Birds: A Life-History Perspective
Martin, T. (1987) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.18.1.453 · Cited by 1,510
Ecology and Management of Breeding Waterfowl
Ratti, J. T., Batt, B. D. J., Afton, A. D., Anderson, M. G., Ankney, C. D., Johnson, D. H., Kadlec, J. A., & Krapu, G. L. (1994) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3809573 · Cited by 938
Evolution of the Social Contract
Skyrms, B. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139924825 · Cited by 743
A Comparative Sudy of the Breeding Ecology of the Great Tit Parus major in Different Habitats
Balen, J. H. V. (2002) · Ardea · doi:10.5253/arde.v61.p1 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Krebs, J. R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1971-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-22
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2093526895
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Territory and Breeding Density in the Great Tit, Parus Major L. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1934734
- The paper
- Krebs, J. R. (1971). Territory and Breeding Density in the Great Tit, Parus Major L. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.