The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A Gradient Analysis of the South Slope
Abstract
Vegetation of the southwest slope of the Santa Catalina Mountains of southeastern Arizona was sampled and transects prepared for 1,000—ft (305 m) elevation belts on granite and gneiss soils from the summit forests (2,440—2,750 m) to the base of the mountains (900 m). Transects also represented subalpine forests above 2,750 m in the Pinaleno Mts. and vegetation of the valley plain or bajada below the mountains, and samples were taken from volcanic soils below 900 m in the Tucson Mts. Principal community—types from high elevations to low are: subalpine forest (Picca engelmanni in the Pinaleno Mts. and Abies lasiocarpa), montane fir forest (Abies concolor, Pseudotsuga menziesii), pine forests (Pinus ponderosa, P. strobiformis), pine—oak forests (P. ponderosa, Quercus hypoleucoides), pine—oak woodlands (P. ponderosa, P. chihuahuana, Q. hypoleucoides, Q. arizonica), pygmy conifer—oak scrub (Pinus cembroides, Juniperus deppeana, Q. arizonica, Q. emoryi, Arctostaphylos pringlei, A. pungens, monocot shrubs), open oak woodland (Q. emoryi, Q. oblongifolia, Vauquelinia californica, monocot shrubs, and grasses), desert—grassland (Agave schottii, Haplopappus laricifolius, and grasses), Sonora desert of mountain slopes (north—slope shrub phase, and south—slope spinose—suffrutescent phase), upper bajada desert (Cercidium microphyllum, Franseria deltoidea), and lower bajada desert (Larrea tridentata). Forests of canyons and arroyos are also described. Relations of communities to elevation and topograhic moisture gradients are represented in a mosaic chart. Physiognomic relations of communities are represented in charts of growth—form coverage in relation to elevation and topographic moisture gradients. Growth—form diversity increases from high—elevation forests strongly dominated by evergreen—needleleaf trees to desert of lower mountain slopes in which pinnate leguminous trees, spinose shrubs, suffrutescent semi—shrubs, and stem—succulents share dominance. Among Raunkiaer life—forms hemicryptophyte species are most numerous at middle and higher elevations, phanerophyte species at lower elevations. In open oak woodlands and desert grasslands phanerophytes, hemicryptophytes, and suffrutescent chamaephytes each make up about one—third of the perennial flora. Desert floras of mountain slopes are characterized by predominance of suffrutescent chamaephytes over both phanerophytes and hemicryptophytes, and large numbers of therophyte species. Analysis in terms of geographic areas of species shows decreasing numbers of Rocky Mountain, Western, and Northern species from high—elevation forests downward, increasing numbers of Southwestern and Latin American species at lower elevations. Madrean species of the Mexican Plateau and Southwestern species predomonate in pine—oak forests and woodlands and pygmy conifer—oak scrub. Sonoran, Chichuahuan, and Latin American species predominate in the desert of lower mountain slopes, and widely distributed Southwestern species in the Larrea desert. Flora of the Catalina Mountains is rich and community species diversities are high. Species diversities increase toward lower elevations desert—grasslands and deserts of lower mountain slopes are among the riches communities in the United States. Floristic diversity is higher in continental than maritime climates, as indicated by comparison of species diversities and community differentiation along topographic moisture gradients in the Catalinas and in California mountains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Patterns of Neotropical Plant Species Diversity
Gentry, A. H. (1982) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6968-8_1 · Cited by 914
Climatic control of vegetation distribution: the role of the water balance
Stephenson, N. L. (1990) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285067 · Cited by 848
Stephenson, N. (1998) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.00233.x · Cited by 616
Hypervolume concepts in niche‐ and trait‐based ecology
Blonder, B. (2018) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.03187 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Whittaker, R. H., & Niering, W. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1965-07
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 429-452
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2028125146
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A Gradient Analysis of the South Slope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1934875
- The paper
- Whittaker, R. H., & Niering, W. A. (1965). Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A Gradient Analysis of the South Slope. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934875
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.