Cited by 92Crustacean biology and ecologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Molting, Growth and Reproductive Strategies in the Terrestrial Isopod, Armadillidium Vulgare

Lawlor, Lawrence R.·1976·Ecology

Abstract

The relationship between molting, growth and reproduction was studied in the terrestrial isopod, Armadillidium vulgare. Reproduction and growth are tied together in three major ways: (1) Among reproductive ♀ ♀ the growth rate is less than that of comparable nonreproductive ♀ ♀. This is because both the wt gain at ecdysis (initially HO) uptake, but ultimately replaced by biomass) and the frequency of molting are less for reproductive ♀ ♀ than for nonreproductive ♀ ♀. This reduced growth associated with reproduction is most pronounced among the smaller ♀ ♀; (2) The estimated total energy devoted to both growth and reproduction among reproductive ♀ ♀ is about the same as the energy devoted only to growth among nonreproductive ♀ ♀ (3) Among individual reproductive ♀ ♀ there was an unexpected positive correlation between growth and reproduction: ♀ ♀ producing larger (size—specific) broods also gain more weight. This contrasts markedly with the clear reduction in growth in the comparison between reproductive and nonreproductive ♀ ♀. It is suggested that this apparently anomalous result may be explained by differential mortality. In natural field populations, large ♀ ♀ produce 2 broods/season and small ♀ ♀ produce only 1 brood/season. Using a simple model relating ♀ size to the number of offspring produced in either 1 or 2 broods, this difference in reproductive output between large and small ♀ ♀ can be explained as an adaptive response to the constraint imposed by the trade off between growth and reproduction. The predicted size at which individuals shift from a one—brooded to a two—brooded strategy is nearly identical to the observed size at which this change in reproductive output occurs in a field population. Using a simple model, the analysis of reproductive strategies is extended to variable environments. It is suggested that reproductive strategies optimizing fitness in a variable environment may destabilize the population's resistance to environmentally imposed disturbances and result in large numerical fluctuations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1935043

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 92

Metadata

Authors
Lawlor, L. R.
Corresponding author
Lawlor, Lawrence R.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1976-11
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1179-1194
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979919762
Cited by
92
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
Armadillidium vulgare, terrestrial isopods, molting, growth, reproductive strategies, growth-reproduction trade-off, energy allocation, brood size, variable environments, population fluctuations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review