The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Molting, Growth and Reproductive Strategies in the Terrestrial Isopod, Armadillidium Vulgare
Abstract
The relationship between molting, growth and reproduction was studied in the terrestrial isopod, Armadillidium vulgare. Reproduction and growth are tied together in three major ways: (1) Among reproductive ♀ ♀ the growth rate is less than that of comparable nonreproductive ♀ ♀. This is because both the wt gain at ecdysis (initially HO) uptake, but ultimately replaced by biomass) and the frequency of molting are less for reproductive ♀ ♀ than for nonreproductive ♀ ♀. This reduced growth associated with reproduction is most pronounced among the smaller ♀ ♀; (2) The estimated total energy devoted to both growth and reproduction among reproductive ♀ ♀ is about the same as the energy devoted only to growth among nonreproductive ♀ ♀ (3) Among individual reproductive ♀ ♀ there was an unexpected positive correlation between growth and reproduction: ♀ ♀ producing larger (size—specific) broods also gain more weight. This contrasts markedly with the clear reduction in growth in the comparison between reproductive and nonreproductive ♀ ♀. It is suggested that this apparently anomalous result may be explained by differential mortality. In natural field populations, large ♀ ♀ produce 2 broods/season and small ♀ ♀ produce only 1 brood/season. Using a simple model relating ♀ size to the number of offspring produced in either 1 or 2 broods, this difference in reproductive output between large and small ♀ ♀ can be explained as an adaptive response to the constraint imposed by the trade off between growth and reproduction. The predicted size at which individuals shift from a one—brooded to a two—brooded strategy is nearly identical to the observed size at which this change in reproductive output occurs in a field population. Using a simple model, the analysis of reproductive strategies is extended to variable environments. It is suggested that reproductive strategies optimizing fitness in a variable environment may destabilize the population's resistance to environmentally imposed disturbances and result in large numerical fluctuations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Lawlor, L. R.
- Corresponding author
- Lawlor, Lawrence R.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1179-1194
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979919762
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Keywords
- Armadillidium vulgare, terrestrial isopods, molting, growth, reproductive strategies, growth-reproduction trade-off, energy allocation, brood size, variable environments, population fluctuations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review