The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonsynchronous Spatial Overlap of Lizards in Patchy Habitats
Abstract
Sympatric native Anolis species with similar structural habitats but contrasting climatic habitats are closer in head and body size on species—rich than on depauperate islands. In two localities, sympatric Anolis species with differential occurrences in sun or shade sought lower, more shaded perches during midday, resulting in partly nonsynchronous utilization of the vegetation by the two species. The second observation may be related to the first in the following way: nonsynchronous spatial overlap could dictate relatively great resource overlap for species coinhabiting patchy or edge areas, requiring great differences between the species in prey size in addition to those in climatic habitat. The extent of such overlap on small depauperate islands could be greater if these contained a greater proportion of patchy or edge habitats (with respect to insolation), or if climatic preferences were broader and more overlapping than on large, species—rich islands. In each locality, the relatively more shade—inhabiting species occurred more often on larger perches and on lower perches than did the other species. In both species of the Bermudan pair, adult males occupied higher and larger perches, and in grahami, shadier perches, than did female—sized individuals. The statistical significance of these and other differences was evaluated using several unweighted g 2 procedures, Cochran's weighted g 2 test and a partitioning technique for analyzing interactions among variables in complex contingency tables. The last method is described in detail in the papaer by Fienberg, immediately following this one.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718 · cited 2×
“More specifically, if the totals of the number of observations in the individual tables are different by a ratio of more than 2 to 1, or the proportions of the observations in the two categories being compared fall outside the range 0.20-0.80, the method is not very suitable (Cochran 1954).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDeming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731829 · Cited by 1,537
Cited by
Schoener, T. W. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4145.27 · Cited by 4,129
Self-citationCost and Benefits of Lizard Thermoregulation
Huey, R. B., & Slatkin, M. (1976) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409470 · Cited by 1,084
Realized niche shift during a global biological invasion
Tingley, R., Vallinoto, M., Sequeira, F., & Kearney, M. R. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1405766111 · Cited by 331
Reñones, O., Polunin, N. V. C., & Goni, R. (2002) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01741.x · Cited by 134
Magnan, P., & FitzGerald, G. J. (1984) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/bf00001377 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoener, T. W.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1970-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 408-418
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1972321748
- Cited by
- 1,745
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonsynchronous Spatial Overlap of Lizards in Patchy Habitats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1935376
- The paper
- Schoener, T. W. (1970). Nonsynchronous Spatial Overlap of Lizards in Patchy Habitats. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.