The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foraging Ecology and Community Organization in Desert Seed‐Eating Ants
Abstract
Granivorous ants in the southwestern deserts of the United States are characterized by species—specific colony foraging behaviors that determine their efficiencies at utilizing seeds from different density distributions. Workers search for food either in groups or as individuals, and these feeding strategies represent specialization for high and low density resources respectively. While gathering experimental seeds, simultaneously supplied in clumped and dispersed distributions, feeding by group foragers focused on the high density resource patches, while individual foragers harvested seeds predominantly from the dispersed distribution, which required that prey be independently discovered. Collecting native seeds from unmanipulated environments, individual foragers tended to spend proportionately more time searching and experience lower foraging success than did group foragers in the same local habitat. During a period of high seed abundance, group foragers collected a much narrower range of prey types than did individual foragers. Colonies of Pogonomyrmex rugosus exhibited a mixed foraging strategy, with the most distinct feeding columns occuring during a period of peak seed abundance. Among group foragers, greatest activity coincided with periods of relatively high seed densities and low climatic stress, and these species utilized tactis such as seed storage, hibernation, and estivation to weather less favorable periods in a resting state. Individual foragers were active at intermediate levels during less favorable periods. Although high and low density seed resources are not renewed independently of one another, density specialization appears to promote coexistence between group and individual foragers. Their capacity to stably partition resources in this way should depend on (1) the degree of difference in their efficiencies at exploiting different density distributions of seeds and (2) the availability of seeds in the habitat as a function of seed density. In more mesic habitats, where seeds are renewed more frequently and probably also in large pulses, group foraging species are proportionately more abundant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Cited by
Granivory in Desert Ecosystems
Brown, J. H., Reichman, O. J., & Davidson, D. W. (1979) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001221 · Cited by 508
Self-citationInouye, R. S., Byers, G. S., & Brown, J. H. (1980) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939043 · Cited by 289
Species Diversity and Community Organization in Desert Seed‐Eating Ants
Davidson, D. W. (1977) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936208 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Davidson, D. W.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 725-737
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2004988428
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foraging Ecology and Community Organization in Desert Seed‐Eating Ants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936209
- The paper
- Davidson, D. W. (1977). Foraging Ecology and Community Organization in Desert Seed‐Eating Ants. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.