Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Foraging Ecology and Community Organization in Desert Seed‐Eating Ants

Davidson, Diane W.·1977·Ecology

Abstract

Granivorous ants in the southwestern deserts of the United States are characterized by species—specific colony foraging behaviors that determine their efficiencies at utilizing seeds from different density distributions. Workers search for food either in groups or as individuals, and these feeding strategies represent specialization for high and low density resources respectively. While gathering experimental seeds, simultaneously supplied in clumped and dispersed distributions, feeding by group foragers focused on the high density resource patches, while individual foragers harvested seeds predominantly from the dispersed distribution, which required that prey be independently discovered. Collecting native seeds from unmanipulated environments, individual foragers tended to spend proportionately more time searching and experience lower foraging success than did group foragers in the same local habitat. During a period of high seed abundance, group foragers collected a much narrower range of prey types than did individual foragers. Colonies of Pogonomyrmex rugosus exhibited a mixed foraging strategy, with the most distinct feeding columns occuring during a period of peak seed abundance. Among group foragers, greatest activity coincided with periods of relatively high seed densities and low climatic stress, and these species utilized tactis such as seed storage, hibernation, and estivation to weather less favorable periods in a resting state. Individual foragers were active at intermediate levels during less favorable periods. Although high and low density seed resources are not renewed independently of one another, density specialization appears to promote coexistence between group and individual foragers. Their capacity to stably partition resources in this way should depend on (1) the degree of difference in their efficiencies at exploiting different density distributions of seeds and (2) the availability of seeds in the habitat as a function of seed density. In more mesic habitats, where seeds are renewed more frequently and probably also in large pulses, group foraging species are proportionately more abundant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1936209

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Davidson, D. W.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-07
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
725-737
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2004988428
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foraging Ecology and Community Organization in Desert Seed‐Eating Ants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936209
The paper
Davidson, D. W. (1977). Foraging Ecology and Community Organization in Desert Seed‐Eating Ants. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936209

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.