Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, Production, and Diversity along the Elevation Gradient

Whittaker, R. H., Niering, W. A.·1975·Ecology

Abstract

Measurements were taken in 15 communities along the elevation gradient from fir forest at high elevations, through pine forest, woodlands, and desert grassland, to deserts at low evelations in the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, and in a Cercocarpus shrubland on limestone. Eight small—tree and shrub speices of woodlands and deserts were subjected to dimension analysis by the Brookhaven system. Aboveground biomass decreased along the elevation gradient from 36—79 dry kg/m 2 in fir and Douglas—fir forest to 0.26—0.43 kg/m 2 in the desert grassland and two desert samples. Net aboveground primary productivity similarly decreased from 1,050—1,150 g/m 2° yr in mesic high—elevation forests to 92—140 g/m 2° yr in desert grassland and deserts. Both biomass and production show a two—slope relation to elevation (and, probably, to precipitation), with a steeper decrease from the high—elevation forests to the mid—elevation woodlands, and a less steep decrease from dry woodlands through desert grassland into desert. The two groups of communities at higher vs. lower elevations also show different relations of leaf area index and chlorophyll to elevation and to productivity. The two groups may represent different adaptive patterns: surface—limiting, with low productivity in relation to precipitation but high production efficiency in relation to surface in the more arid lower elevations, vs. surface—abundant, with high productivity relative to precipitation based on high community surface area, but lower production efficiency in relation to this area, in the more humid higher elevations. Vascular plant species diversity shows no simple relation to productivity, but decreases from high—elevation fir frests to the pine forests, increases from these to the open woodlands, and decreases from dry woodlands through the desert grassland and mountain slope desert to the lower bajada (creosotebush) desert.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1936291

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
Whittaker, R. H., & Niering, W. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1975-07
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
771-790
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2001946254
Cited by
498
References
0
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, Production, and Diversity along the Elevation Gradient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936291
The paper
Whittaker, R. H., & Niering, W. A. (1975). Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, Production, and Diversity along the Elevation Gradient. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.