The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, Production, and Diversity along the Elevation Gradient
Abstract
Measurements were taken in 15 communities along the elevation gradient from fir forest at high elevations, through pine forest, woodlands, and desert grassland, to deserts at low evelations in the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, and in a Cercocarpus shrubland on limestone. Eight small—tree and shrub speices of woodlands and deserts were subjected to dimension analysis by the Brookhaven system. Aboveground biomass decreased along the elevation gradient from 36—79 dry kg/m 2 in fir and Douglas—fir forest to 0.26—0.43 kg/m 2 in the desert grassland and two desert samples. Net aboveground primary productivity similarly decreased from 1,050—1,150 g/m 2° yr in mesic high—elevation forests to 92—140 g/m 2° yr in desert grassland and deserts. Both biomass and production show a two—slope relation to elevation (and, probably, to precipitation), with a steeper decrease from the high—elevation forests to the mid—elevation woodlands, and a less steep decrease from dry woodlands through desert grassland into desert. The two groups of communities at higher vs. lower elevations also show different relations of leaf area index and chlorophyll to elevation and to productivity. The two groups may represent different adaptive patterns: surface—limiting, with low productivity in relation to precipitation but high production efficiency in relation to surface in the more arid lower elevations, vs. surface—abundant, with high productivity relative to precipitation based on high community surface area, but lower production efficiency in relation to this area, in the more humid higher elevations. Vascular plant species diversity shows no simple relation to productivity, but decreases from high—elevation fir frests to the pine forests, increases from these to the open woodlands, and decreases from dry woodlands through the desert grassland and mountain slope desert to the lower bajada (creosotebush) desert.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity
Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J., & Niemela, P. (1981) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283817 · Cited by 1,767
PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN RIPARIAN WETLANDS—A TEST OF BIODIVERSITY THEORY
Pollock, M. M., Naiman, R. J., & Hanley, T. A. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0094:psrirw]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 527
Modeling Species Distribution and Change Using Random Forest
Evans, J. S., Murphy, M. A., Holden, Z. A., & Cushman, S. A. (2011) · Predictive Species and Habitat Modeling in Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7390-0_8 · Cited by 364
Ecological optimality in water‐limited natural soil‐vegetation systems: 1. Theory and hypothesis
Eagleson, P. S. (1982) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr018i002p00325 · Cited by 349
Rooting depth, water availability, and vegetation cover along an aridity gradient in Patagonia
Schulze, E. D., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., Jobbagy, E., Buchmann, N., Bauer, G., Canadell, J., Jackson, R. B., Loreti, J., Oesterheld, M., et al. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333727 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Whittaker, R. H., & Niering, W. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-07
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 771-790
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2001946254
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, Production, and Diversity along the Elevation Gradient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936291
- The paper
- Whittaker, R. H., & Niering, W. A. (1975). Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona. V. Biomass, Production, and Diversity along the Elevation Gradient. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.