Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Foraging Patterns and Resource Utilization in Seven Species of Bats in a Seasonal Tropical Forest

Open access
Heithaus, E. Raymond, Fleming, Theodore H., Opler, Paul A.·1975·Ecology

Abstract

Many tropical bats eat fruit, nectar, and pollen, and many tropical plants are pollinated or dispersed by bats. These groups make up a coevolved system that illustrates the effects plants can have on animal populations, and conversely, the effects animals can have on plant populations. This paper reports a 2—yr intensivie study of one bat—plant community in a seasonal Costa Rican forest. Seven common phyllostomatid bat species visited flowers or fruits. These were Glossophaga soricina, Phyllostomus discolor, Artibeus jamaicensis, Artibeus lituratus, Sturnira lilium, and Carollia perspecillata. The incidence of nectar ivory was high among these species, even among the species previously considered to be frugivores. Flora resources were seasonally abundant and competition for these resources appeared minimal during the period of peak abundance, but only G. ssoricina was nectarivorous during the period of low flower abundance. Fruit resources were more evenly available through the year and were more finely divided among the species of bats. There was a correlation between size of bat and the average size of fruits eaten. To the extent that competition for food has influenced the structure of this bat community, competition for fruits was more important than competition for nectar and pollen in determining species diversity. Resource distributions through space and time also infuenced bat foraging and reproductive behaviors. Small species of bats feed on resources of high abundance, whereas large species utilize resources that are patchy in time and space. The latter species probably forage in groups to maximize foraging efficiency. Reproductive behavior is seasonal and correlated with resource abundance. The flowering periods of plant species tend to be displaced, suggesting competition among plants for bat—pollinator services. A combination of the timing of plant—reproductive behavior and bat foraging characteristics promotes long—distance outcrossing and seed dispersal. These are critical factors in determining the low—density propulations characteristic of many tropical plant species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1936295

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Heithaus, E. R., Fleming, T. H., & Opler, P. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1975-07
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
841-854
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2059041259
Cited by
481
References
10
FWCI
19.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foraging Patterns and Resource Utilization in Seven Species of Bats in a Seasonal Tropical Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936295
The paper
Heithaus, E. R., Fleming, T. H., & Opler, P. A. (1975). Foraging Patterns and Resource Utilization in Seven Species of Bats in a Seasonal Tropical Forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936295

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.