The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Responses of Annual Vegetation to Temperature and Rainfall Patterns in Northern California
Abstract
Weather patterns significantly influence annual vegetation, both within and between years. The impact of these weather patterns on standing crop, cover, and botanical composition were investigated during the years 1955—1973 inclusive. Standing crop increased as the growing season progressed from March to June, while cover declined. Erodium spp. Carduus pycnocephalus, Geranium spp. and Hypochoeris glabra all declined between these 2 calendar dates. Other annual species increased in botanical composition as the growing season progressed. Weather patterns primarily influenced total standing crop during the initial period of plant growth. Following germination, temperatures were typically warm and conducive to plant growth; drought at this time suppressed total standing crop. Consistent precipitation following fall germination, and again during the period of rapid plant growth in spring, contributes to a "grass year" in the annual type. The sequence of freezing temperatures in relation to phenology of developing grass seedlings determines the relative proportion of annual grass species from one year to the next. Botanical composition of Trifolium spp. and Medicago hispida depends upon mild autumn weather, particularly when such fall weather favors none of the annual grass species. Botanical composition of Erodium spp. positively correlated with weather patterns associated with dry fall conditions. Multiple regressions of standing crop on weather patterns produced useful guidelines for manipulating animal units to achieve complete utilization of available forage, particularly when these equations were implemented in seasonal stages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A hierarchical set of models for species response analysis
Huisman, J., Olff, H., & Fresco, L. F. M. (1993) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3235732 · Cited by 473
Responses of Grassland Production to Single and Multiple Global Environmental Changes
Dukes, J. S., Chiariello, N. R., Cleland, E. E., Moore, L. A., Shaw, M. R., Thayer, S., Tobeck, T., Mooney, H. A., & Field, C. B. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030319 · Cited by 364
Steenwerth, K. L., Jackson, L. E., Calderón, F. J., Stromberg, M. R., & Scow, K. M. (2002) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(02)00144-x · Cited by 344
Effects of Rainfall Variability and Gopher Disturbance on Serpentine Annual Grassland Dynamics
Hobbs, R. J., & Mooney, H. A. (1991) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938902 · Cited by 253
Harris, Z. M., Alberti, G., Viger, M., Jenkins, J. R., Rowe, R., McNamara, N. P., & Taylor, G. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12347 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitt, M. D., & Heady, H. F.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-03
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 336-350
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2076488482
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses of Annual Vegetation to Temperature and Rainfall Patterns in Northern California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936378
- The paper
- Pitt, M. D., & Heady, H. F. (1978). Responses of Annual Vegetation to Temperature and Rainfall Patterns in Northern California. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.