The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Primate Social Groups as Biological Islands
Abstract
The intestinal protozoan faunas of 11 social groups of Cercocebus albigena, 3 groups of Ceropithecus mitis, 3 groups of Cercopithecus ascanius, 2 groups of rain forest and 4 groups of savannah Papio anubis are documented. All individuals in a particular social group exhibit identical protozoan faunas. All social groups of each species, except the savannah P. anubis, exhibit intergroup differences in the composition of their protozoan faunas. The number of intestinal, protozoan species in Cercocebus albigena social groups is a function of group size. The similarity between the protozoan faunas of different C. albigena groups is related to the density of the social groups and types of land tenure in particular localities. Past social history of C. albigena groups may have some influence on the level of similarity of different groups' faunas. Entrance of a nongroup member into a group of Cercopithecus mitis resulted in an increase in the species richness of the group's protozoan fauna. Group fission may result in reduction of a group's protozoan species richness. All groups of savannah Papio anubis exhibit identical protozoan faunas. I argue that this is because savannah P. anubis has a higher rate of exchange of individuals between groups than has been recorded for the rain forest primates under consideration. I hypothesize that the differing rates of exchange are due to disease—related selection against traits which result in high rates of individual exchange among rain forest primate groups. Primate social groups are functionally biological islands; the species of their protozoan faunas changes according to group size and levels of protozoan migration between groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Organization and Parasite Risk in Mammals: Integrating Theory and Empirical Studies
Altizer, S., Nunn, C. L., Thrall, P. H., Gittleman, J. L., Antonovics, J., Cunningham, A. A., Dobson, A. P., Ezenwa, V., Jones, K. E., Pedersen, A. B., et al. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.030102.151725 · Cited by 770
Behavioral adaptations to pathogens and parasites: Five strategies
Hart, B. L. (1990) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80038-7 · Cited by 734
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 530
Ectoparasitism as a Cost of Coloniality in Cliff Swallows (Hirundo Pyrrhonota)
Brown, C. R., & Brown, M. B. (1986) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938676 · Cited by 484
Multiparasite communities in animals and humans: frequency, structure and pathogenic significance
Petney, T. N., & Andrews, R. H. (1998) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0020-7519(97)00189-6 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeland, W. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-08
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 719-728
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2031557797
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primate Social Groups as Biological Islands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936609
- The paper
- Freeland, W. J. (1979). Primate Social Groups as Biological Islands. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.