The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pattern and Biological Microsite Effects in Two Shrub Communities, Southern California
Abstract
Strip transects of 100 contiguous, aligned quadrats were sampled during the spring blooming in a creosotebush (Larrea tridentata) semidesert and a chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum) chaparral, with species covers in quadrats recorded. Techniques of pattern analysis included reciprocal averaging ordination of quadrats, measurements of pattern diversity and pattern periodicity, and species association and contagion. In both communities the first ordination axis expressed a strong pattern of differentiation of the herb flora from shrub centers to openings; second and third axes expressed other responses of herb species to shrub species and shrub cover. The pattern axis represents a principal direction of niche difference to which most species responded and along which several pairs of congeners were separated. Pattern periodicities were 6 m (weakly defined) in the semidesert and 9 m in the chaparral; pattern diversities were 1.4 and 1.8 half—changes. Quadrat species richness was highest in the transitions between shrub clumps and openings in the semidesert, but higher in the openings and lower under the shrubs of the chaparral. Overall alpha diversity resulted from roughly comparable contributions of point or small—quadrat diversity, pattern diversity of more common species, and rare species. The importance of biological modification of microsites for population function and niche relationships is suggested by species responses to the primary pattern axis, the responses of some herb species to particular shrub species, and the indicated allelopathic effects in the chaparral.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness
Colwell, R. K., & Lees, D. C. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01767-x · Cited by 1,121
Coexistence of plant species with similar niches
Shmida, A., & Ellner, S. (1984) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00044894 · Cited by 513
Self-citationMicro-site effects of trees and shrubs in dry savannas
Vetaas, O. R. (1992) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3235758 · Cited by 401
Metapopulations and metacommunities: Combining spatial and temporal perspectives in plant ecology
Alexander, H. M., Foster, B. L., Ballantyne, F., Collins, C. D., Antonovics, J., & Holt, R. D. (2012) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01917.x · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Shmida, A., & Whittaker, R. H.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 234-251
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2132327625
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pattern and Biological Microsite Effects in Two Shrub Communities, Southern California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936684
- The paper
- Shmida, A., & Whittaker, R. H. (1981). Pattern and Biological Microsite Effects in Two Shrub Communities, Southern California. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.