The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grazing Effects of Four Marine Intertidal Herbivores on the Microflora
Abstract
The impact of 4 species of intertidal gastropods (3 limpets and 1 periwinkle) on microalgal species composition and biomass has been evaluated and the degree of overlap of grazer diets has been examined. A series of clay pipes set in a mud flat became artificial substrates for diatom assemblages; grazers were added to the outside of these pipes after an initial period during which the flora developed. The mud proved to be an effective barrier to both immigration and emigration. All 4 gastropods selectively removed 3 diatom species from the pipes: Melosira moniliformis, Melosira nummuloides, and Fragilaria striatula var. californica. These species consist of long chains of moderate—sized cells that form an overstory within the diatom mat; a total of 130 additional species may be found within the diatom community. Selective removal may be facilitated by the chain morphology, by the location of these diatoms in the outermost portion of the mat, and by loose adhesion of these species to the rock surface. Diatoms with potentially tighter adhesion such as the stalked Achnanthes spp. are less affected by grazers. The abundance of 3 species of blue—green algae was little changed by grazing. All 4 grazers had remarkably similar diets, apparently using the same resource in about the same way. Data on the amount of chlorophyll a per m 2 on natural rock surface indicate that grazers greatly reduced microalgal standing crops. Differences in grazer zonation and use of macroalgae, coupled with increased food availability during reproductive seasons (winter and spring), allow continued coexistence of these very similar herbivores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Cited by
Food Webs: Linkage, Interaction Strength and Community Infrastructure
Paine, R. T. (1980) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4220 · Cited by 1,824
A Functional Group Approach to the Structure of Algal-Dominated Communities
Steneck, R. S., & Dethier, M. N. (1994) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545860 · Cited by 1,156
Sousa, W. P. (1979) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942484 · Cited by 757
DIATOM EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES: FUNCTION, FINE STRUCTURE, CHEMISTRY, AND PHYSIOLOGY
Hoagland, K. D., Rosowski, J. R., Gretz, M. R., & Roemer, S. C. (1993) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00537.x · Cited by 675
Habitat structure and predator—prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems
Heck, K. L., & Crowder, L. B. (1991) · Habitat Structure · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3076-9_14 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicotri, M. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1020-1032
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2025707551
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grazing Effects of Four Marine Intertidal Herbivores on the Microflora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1936922
- The paper
- Nicotri, M. E. (1977). Grazing Effects of Four Marine Intertidal Herbivores on the Microflora. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.