Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Removal of Wild Nutmeg (Virola Surinamensis) Crops by Birds

Howe, Henry F., Vande Kerckhove, Gayle A.·1981·Ecology

Abstract

We observed birds and mammals visiting individual plants in a Panamanian population of the rainforest tree Virola surinamensis (W ild Nutmeg) to determine (1) relative importance of different dispersal agents, and (2) the relationships between crop size, crop quality, and seed removal. Arils of this tree are exceptionally nutritious (63% fat, 9% nonstructural carbohydrate, 3% protein), but draw remarkably few species of fruit—eating animals. Six birds take 77% of the seeds handled by animals. One toucan (Ramphastos°swainsonii) accounts for 35% of the seeds handled; other birds (Penelope purpurascens, Trogon massena, Baryphthengus martii, Pteroglossus torquatus, Ramphastos sulfuratus) play lesser roles. The smallest visitor, a cotinga (Tityra semifasciata) eats arils but does not disperse seeds. One monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) removes 3% of the seeds handled by frugivores, but smells and rejects or otherwise wastes 9%. Such a small assemblage is anomalous in a forest with at least 78 species of fruit—eating animals; other trees with arillate seeds of similar size draw as many as 23 frugivores. We hypothesize that the size of the assemblage is limited by seed size, small crop size, and perhaps by defensive compounds in the arils. Despite the small assemblage, an average of 62% (range: 13—91%) of the fruits available to animals are taken. Fruits are so nutritious that trees with both small and large crops are depleted; no variance in the percentage of seeds removed can be attributed to crop size. Fruits of different individual trees do vary in size; 59% of the variation in the percentage of seeds taken can be attributed to mean seed size. Fruit—eating animals preferentially deplete trees with small seeds, and coincidentally favor trees with high aril—to—seed ratios. No significant portion of the variance in d ispersal success can be explained by aril mass alone. We hypothesize that consistent differences in seed size could result in dramatic differences in dispersal, and hence reproduction, over the lifetime of individual trees. On the other hand, selection may alternatively favor small seed size and high dispersability in years when frugivores are abundant, and large seed size and enhanced seedling vigor in the parental stand when fruit—eating birds are scarce. Small—seeded plants are likely to colonize new sites; large—seeded individuals are likely to produce offspring that fare well in competition with other seedlings near parent trees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1937007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Howe, H. F., & Vande Kerckhove, G. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-08
Volume
62
Issue
4
Pages
1093-1106
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2094868343
Cited by
324
References
1
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Removal of Wild Nutmeg (Virola Surinamensis) Crops by Birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937007
The paper
Howe, H. F., & Vande Kerckhove, G. A. (1981). Removal of Wild Nutmeg (Virola Surinamensis) Crops by Birds. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.