The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Colonizing Abilities of 'Biennial' Plant Species in Relation to Ground Cover: Implications for their Distributions in a Successional Sere
Abstract
The "biennial" plant series Verbascum thapsus, Oenothera biennis, Daucas carota, and Tragopogon dubius are all found in abandoned agricultural fields, but they differ in their time of first appearance, peak abundance, and length of time populations persist. In experimental field studies these species showed differences in their abilities to colonize various types of ground cover. Seedling emergence, survival, and growth were highest for all four species in patches of bare ground. The small—seeded species, Verbascum and Oenothera, survived only in bare ground. In contrast, the large—seeded species, Daucus and Tragopogon, survived in several ground cover types. Relative coverage of three ground cover types and differences in seedling performance in these cover types were compared in a 1—yr and 15—yr old field. Verbascum and Oenothera became established only in the 1—yr old field where bare ground was abundant and not in the 15—yr old field where these patches were rare (°1% of area). When bare—ground patches were created experimentally in the 15—yr old field, both species were able to establish, supporting the conclusion that it is availability of bare ground rather than age of field per se that confines these two species to recently disturbed areas. In contrast, Daucus and Tragopogon became established in both fields, although seedling emergence, survival, growth, and reproductive output were higher in the 1—yr old field. Under nonexperimental conditions, however, these two species are not generally found in newly abandoned fields. Their absence is due to the fact that they produce seeds that, although broadly dispersed, do not survive in the soil for >1—2 yr and are not often present in a newly distributed area. Once dispersed to and established in an area, they can persist for several generations because their seedlings can survive in several types of ground cover, including those with thick vegetation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats
Tilman, D. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939377 · Cited by 2,780
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Goldberg, D. E., & Barton, A. M. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285357 · Cited by 747
Correlates of Seed Size Variation: A Comparison Among Five Temperate Floras
Leishman, M. R., Westoby, M., & Jurado, E. (1995) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261604 · Cited by 308
Establishment, competition and the distribution of native grasses among Michigan old-fields
Foster, B. L. (1999) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00366.x · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, K. L., & Werner, P. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 921-931
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2018861498
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colonizing Abilities of 'Biennial' Plant Species in Relation to Ground Cover: Implications for their Distributions in a Successional Sere. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937232
- The paper
- Gross, K. L., & Werner, P. A. (1982). Colonizing Abilities of 'Biennial' Plant Species in Relation to Ground Cover: Implications for their Distributions in a Successional Sere. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.