The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of Organic Debris Dams in Regulating the Export of Dissolved and Particulate Matter from a Forested Watershed
Abstract
An organic debris dam is an accumulation of organic matter in a stream which obstructs water flow. Debris dams trap sediments in the pool formed upstream from them and the dam structure itself collects particulate organic matter. This study was done at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, in New Hampshire, to examine the relative importance of these structures in retention of sediment and organic matter in a small stream ecosystem. An experimental approach was used in which all organic debris dams were removed from a 175—m section of second—order stream, just above a gauging weir. The material being exported from the watershed was separated into three size categories: dissolved matter (<0.5 μm), fine particulate matter (0.5 μm to 1 mm), and coarse particualte matter (>1 mm). Export of each size fraction was monitored for at least 1 yr prior to dam removal, and for 1 yr following removal. Following dam removal, export of dissolved matter increased slightly due to an increase in the concentration of dissolved organic carbon in the stream water during periods of high discharge. Fine particulate matter export increased dramatically at high discharges following dam removal; concentrations in some instances achieved values five times higher than any observed before dam removal. Coarse particulate matter export also was greatly increase. Calculating dissolved matter and particulate matter export from the watershed, with an without organic debris dams, showed that dam removal brought about a 6% increase in the export of dissolved matter and a 500% increase in the export of both fine particulate and coarse particulate matter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones
Naiman, R. J., & Décamps, H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · Cited by 2,791
An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones
Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J., McKee, W. A., & Cummins, K. W. (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311607 · Cited by 2,460
The Importance of Land-Use Legacies to Ecology and Conservation
FOSTER, D., SWANSON, F., ABER, J., BURKE, I., BROKAW, N., TILMAN, D., & KNAPP, A. (2003) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0077:tiolul]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,213
Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Riparian Zones: Potential for Improved Water Quality Management1
Vidon, P., Allan, C., Burns, D., Duval, T. P., Gurwick, N., Inamdar, S., Lowrance, R., Okay, J., Scott, D., & Sebestyen, S. (2010) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00420.x · Cited by 508
Sweeney, B. W., & Newbold, J. D. (2014) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/jawr.12203 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilby, R. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1234-1243
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1995929538
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Organic Debris Dams in Regulating the Export of Dissolved and Particulate Matter from a Forested Watershed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937288
- The paper
- Bilby, R. E. (1981). Role of Organic Debris Dams in Regulating the Export of Dissolved and Particulate Matter from a Forested Watershed. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.