The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pollination Effectiveness of Specialist and Generalist Visitors to a North Carolina Population of Claytonia Virginica
Abstract
We measured the pollination effectiveness and visitation rates of major insect visitors of Claytonia virginica, an obligately insect—pollinated spring wildflower, in a North Carolina deciduous forest. Seed set in the population was not pollinator—limited except during rainy weather and very early in the flowering season. The solitary bee Andrena erigeniae and the bee fly Bombylius major were responsible for more than 75% of the visits to C. virginica. Andrena erigeniae is a specialist on C. virginica, while B. major is a common visitor to many plant species. We measured the effectiveness of a pollinator by the probability that a visit resulted in fruit (capsule) formation. For those flowers that were successfully pollinated and thus produced a capsule, number of seeds did not vary with visitor identity or the total number of visits received. Although B. major and female A. erigeniae differ greatly in morphology and foraging behavior, a visit by either insect results in equally high seed set. As B. major is about two—thirds as abundant as A. erigeniae females on C. virginica, both insects contribute substantially to seed set in our population. With the visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness we measured, the generalist B. major alone has the potential to pollinate three—quarters of the flowers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Variation Among Floral Visitors in Pollination Ability: A Precondition for Mutualism Specialization
Schemske, D. W., & Horvitz, C. C. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.225.4661.519 · Cited by 451
A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency
Ne'eman, G., Jürgens, A., Newstrom‐Lloyd, L., Potts, S. G., & Dafni, A. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2009.00108.x · Cited by 431
Pollination Ecology, Plant Population Structure, and Gene Flow
HANDEL, S. N. (1983) · Pollination Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-583980-8.50015-6 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Motten, A. F., Campbell, D. R., Alexander, D. E., & Miller, H. L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1278-1287
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1975939298
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pollination Effectiveness of Specialist and Generalist Visitors to a North Carolina Population of Claytonia Virginica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937292
- The paper
- Motten, A. F., Campbell, D. R., Alexander, D. E., & Miller, H. L. (1981). Pollination Effectiveness of Specialist and Generalist Visitors to a North Carolina Population of Claytonia Virginica. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937292
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.