The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tropical Territorial Damselfishses: Is Density Limited by Aggression or Recruitment?
Abstract
The spatial distributions of two common damselfishes, Pomacentrus wardi and P. flavicauda, suggest that they compete for common resources within lagoons of the southern Great Barrier Reef. Both fishes are herbivores that defend territories on rocky substrata covered with shallow water, but are segregated by microhabitat. When young P. flavicauda recruit into the habitat where P. wardi are most numerous, they have lower persistence than counterparts on reefs where conspecifics predominate. Several experiments were done, using as replicates that large patch reefs populated by P. wardi, to determine what effects territory—holding individuals have on the distribution and abundance of conspecifics, P. flavicauda, and other grazing fishes. Total and selective removal of the numerically dominant P. wardi revealed that these reefs are mostly repopulated by larval fishes (recruitment), rather than by already recruited fishes (immigration). P. wardi are the most frequent recruits. The removals also showed that resident P. wardi do not determine the numbers of conspecific larvae invading their territories, and do not reduce their survival after recruitment (at least for 300—400 d). They do determine the growth of such juveniles. Despite this interaction, there was no evidence that either density or biomass is usually regulated in these populations. Both measures vary greatly among replicate reefs. The lack of numerical equilibrium, within the study period, was caused by a patchy and limiting supply of larval recruits. Manipulations also showed that resident P. wardi do not limit the recruitment or reduce the postrecruitment survival of P. flavicauda on large patch reefs. An unknown density—independent cause is implicated in the observed habitat—segregation and in the failure of P. flavicauda to reach breeding size on such reefs. The removal of P. wardi produced different results for the fish grazers from other families, depending upon their feeding strategy. For example, solitary acanthurids concentrated their grazing activities on reefs with fewer damselfishes, but a schooling parrotfish did not. The outcomes of these perturbations support a nonequilibrial view of reef fish communities, rather than hypotheses that emphasize the importance of competition among populations usually at carrying capacity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jones, G. P., Almany, G. R., Russ, G. R., Sale, P. F., Steneck, R. S., van Oppen, M. J. H., & Willis, B. L. (2009) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-009-0469-9 · Cited by 561
Chesson, P. L. (1985) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(85)90030-9 · Cited by 417
Victor, B. C. (1986) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00428555 · Cited by 276
Evolution of local recruitment and its consequences for marine populations
(2002) · ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) · Cited by 267
Food availability affects growth in a coral reef fish
Jones, G. P. (1986) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377123 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Doherty, P. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 176-190
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2081960693
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tropical Territorial Damselfishses: Is Density Limited by Aggression or Recruitment? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937339
- The paper
- Doherty, P. J. (1983). Tropical Territorial Damselfishses: Is Density Limited by Aggression or Recruitment? Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.