Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growth, Production, and Decomposition Dynamics of Sphagnum under Natural and Experimentally Acidified Conditions

Rochefort, Line, Vitt, Dale H., Bayley, Suzanne E.·1990·Ecology

Abstract

Annual linear growth, net primary production, and decomposition of Sphagnum fuscum, Sphagnum magellanicum, and Sphagnum angustifolium were measured under experimental acidification and natural conditions in a poor fen at the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA), Ontario, Canada. Acidification increased growth and production of most species (2 out of 3 in the oligotrophic zone, and 2 out of 3 in the minerotrophic zone) in the first 2 yr. After 2—3 yr of artificial acidification, growth and production were not stimulated to the same extent in experimental areas as in earlier years. After 4 yr, growth and production in the experimental area declined so that they were the same as controls for 4 of the 6 treatments. Therefore, the effect of the acid treatment changed over the years. With 4 yr of simulated “acid rain,” decomposition was unaffected. Our results suggest that the fertilizing effect of SO 42— and NO 3— in North American acid precipitation as suggested previously in the literature is a very short—term one, at least for this type of peatland. Under natural conditions, in the oligotrophic central zone of mire 239, production for hollow species was somewhat greater than for hummock species for the 4 yr studied. Since the decomposition rate ratio between hummock—top, mid—hummock, and hollow species is roughly in the ratio 7:9:13, the rate of peat accumulation should be higher in hummocks. Hence hummocks appear to be maintained in this poor fen due to low decomposition rates rather than relatively high production. For 3 of the 4 yr studied (1985—1987) in the minerotrophic edge zone, hummock production (303, 175, and 156 g°m—2°yr—1, respectively) was greater than hollow (198, 100, and 97 g°M—2°yr—1) and mid—hummock production (103, 59, and 52 g°m—2°yr—1). The relative decomposition rates of the species had the same ratio as in the oligotrophic zone. Thus hummocks appear to be expanding in this minerotrophic edge zone at a faster rate than in the oligotrophic zone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1937607

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Rochefort, L., Vitt, D. H., & Bayley, S. E.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-10
Volume
71
Issue
5
Pages
1986-2000
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W1999326850
Cited by
221
References
1
FWCI
7.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth, Production, and Decomposition Dynamics of Sphagnum under Natural and Experimentally Acidified Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937607
The paper
Rochefort, L., Vitt, D. H., & Bayley, S. E. (1990). Growth, Production, and Decomposition Dynamics of Sphagnum under Natural and Experimentally Acidified Conditions. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937607

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.