The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growth, Production, and Decomposition Dynamics of Sphagnum under Natural and Experimentally Acidified Conditions
Abstract
Annual linear growth, net primary production, and decomposition of Sphagnum fuscum, Sphagnum magellanicum, and Sphagnum angustifolium were measured under experimental acidification and natural conditions in a poor fen at the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA), Ontario, Canada. Acidification increased growth and production of most species (2 out of 3 in the oligotrophic zone, and 2 out of 3 in the minerotrophic zone) in the first 2 yr. After 2—3 yr of artificial acidification, growth and production were not stimulated to the same extent in experimental areas as in earlier years. After 4 yr, growth and production in the experimental area declined so that they were the same as controls for 4 of the 6 treatments. Therefore, the effect of the acid treatment changed over the years. With 4 yr of simulated “acid rain,” decomposition was unaffected. Our results suggest that the fertilizing effect of SO 42— and NO 3— in North American acid precipitation as suggested previously in the literature is a very short—term one, at least for this type of peatland. Under natural conditions, in the oligotrophic central zone of mire 239, production for hollow species was somewhat greater than for hummock species for the 4 yr studied. Since the decomposition rate ratio between hummock—top, mid—hummock, and hollow species is roughly in the ratio 7:9:13, the rate of peat accumulation should be higher in hummocks. Hence hummocks appear to be maintained in this poor fen due to low decomposition rates rather than relatively high production. For 3 of the 4 yr studied (1985—1987) in the minerotrophic edge zone, hummock production (303, 175, and 156 g°m—2°yr—1, respectively) was greater than hollow (198, 100, and 97 g°M—2°yr—1) and mid—hummock production (103, 59, and 52 g°m—2°yr—1). The relative decomposition rates of the species had the same ratio as in the oligotrophic zone. Thus hummocks appear to be expanding in this minerotrophic edge zone at a faster rate than in the oligotrophic zone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Cited by
How Sphagnum bogs down other plants
van Breemen, N. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(95)90007-1 · Cited by 803
The Role of Bryophytes in Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling
Turetsky, M. R. (2003) · The Bryologist · doi:10.1639/05 · Cited by 561
Carbon cycling in peatlands A review of processes and controls
Blodau, C. (2002) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a02-004 · Cited by 400
Species-Controlled Sphagnum Decay on a South Swedish Raised Bog
Johnson, L. C., & Damman, A. W. H. (1991) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545341 · Cited by 284
Multiple limiting gradients in peatlands: A call for a new paradigm
Bridgham, S. D., Pastor, J., Janssens, J. A., Chapin, C., & Malterer, T. J. (1996) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/bf03160645 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Rochefort, L., Vitt, D. H., & Bayley, S. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1986-2000
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1999326850
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growth, Production, and Decomposition Dynamics of Sphagnum under Natural and Experimentally Acidified Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937607
- The paper
- Rochefort, L., Vitt, D. H., & Bayley, S. E. (1990). Growth, Production, and Decomposition Dynamics of Sphagnum under Natural and Experimentally Acidified Conditions. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.