Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 433

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intertidal Mosaics: Patch Size, Propagule Availability, and Spatially Variable Patterns of Succession

Sousa, Wayne P.·1984·Ecology

Abstract

Localized disturbances transform most assemblages of sessile organisms into mosaics of patches differing in characteristics such as size and age (time since last disturbed). This mosaic nature of natural communities is especially evident on exposed intertidal shores along the northwest coast of North America, where the competitively dominant mussel, Mytilus californianus, occupies much of the space at mid—tidal levels. Nearly continuous beds of this species are interrupted by patches of open space generated mainly by the shearing forces of winter storm waves. These patches serve as foci for the recruitment, growth, and reproduction of many competitively inferior, f ugitive species, including both algae and sessile invertebrates. These species are doomed to local extinction as the lateral encroachment of adult mussels closes the patch and excludes then from the area. This study examined the dynamics of algal succession within experimental patches cleared in mussel beds. In particular, two potentially important sources of variation in successional dynamics were investigated: (1) the size of the patch when first created, and (2) the location of the patch with respect to potential sources of propagules. The size of a cleared patch was found to influence strongly the course of algal succession. This effect was largely indirect, resulting from an interaction between patch size and grazing intensity. Small patches support higher densities of grazers, especially limpets, than do large patches. As a consequence, the assemblages of algae that develop within small and large patches differ markedly. The assemblage in small patches includes grazer—resistance but apparently competitively inferior species, whereas that in large patches is composed of grazer—vulnerable but competitively superior species. Small patches appear to serve as refuges from competition for grazer—resistant species. Recruitment was variable among the experimental patches. Percent cover of several species was found to be highly correlated with the cover of epozoic conspecific adults within 1 m of the edge of the patch. This result suggests that a number of the species inhabiting patches within mussel beds may disperse their propagules over relatively short distances. For such species, patch dispersion may influence the regional dynamics of their populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1937789

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 433

Metadata

Authors
Sousa, W. P.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-12
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
1918-1935
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2109859075
Cited by
433
References
0
FWCI
12.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intertidal Mosaics: Patch Size, Propagule Availability, and Spatially Variable Patterns of Succession. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937789
The paper
Sousa, W. P. (1984). Intertidal Mosaics: Patch Size, Propagule Availability, and Spatially Variable Patterns of Succession. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937789

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.