The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Community and Family Background on Achievement
Abstract
N recent years, considerable attention has been devoted to understanding the causes of earnings differentials between blacks and whites. Conventional economic analysis of the issue has been divided into supply and demand factors. Demand side arguments point to differential returns to blacks and whites with the same level of market-valued characteristics as a principal cause of the lower earnings of blacks. Supply side arguments, on the other hand, focus on the quality and quantity of the market-valued characteristics of black compared to white workers. Although this dichotomization is obviously a necessary and useful step in understanding the causes of earnings differentials between blacks and whites, it fails to place sufficient emphasis on the process by which market-valued characteristics are actually obtained. In particular, given the effect of parents' economic status on their children, this approach does not illuminate the intertemporal consequences of racial discrimination for the acquisition of market-valued characteristics. Also, given the potential of the effects of the community of origin on achievement, it may, in addition, obscure many of the negative externalities affecting the acquisition process that result from being part of a discriminated-against group. This paper addresses these problems by examining a recursive model of the effects of socioeconomic background on education and earnings of black and white men ages 23-32. The main difference between this analysis and other efforts in this area is that it examines not only the effects of the socioeconomic status of an individual's parents, but also the effects of characteristics of the individual's community of origin. While other studies have included variables measuring differences due to region and/or size of place of origin, this paper also controls for differences between individuals at the more disaggregated neighborhood level. The findings of the study suggest that neighborhood differences are at least as important as family characteristics in explaining the gaps between black and white achievement and that the omission of neighborhood characteristics results in a misleading picture of the source of background effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development
McLoyd, V. C. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.2.185 · Cited by 3,763
Intergenerational Mobility in the Labor Market
Solon, G. (1999) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s1573-4463(99)03010-2 · Cited by 1,109
Sobel, M. E. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000636 · Cited by 468
Growing Up in Poor Neighborhoods: How Much Does It Matter?
Mayer, S. E., & Jencks, C. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.243.4897.1441 · Cited by 442
The Impact of Parental Occupation and Socioeconomic Status on Choice of College Major
Leppel, K., Williams, M. L., & Waldauer, C. (2001) · Journal of Family and Economic Issues · doi:10.1023/a:1012716828901 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Datcher, L.
- Venue
- The Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-02
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988712677
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Community and Family Background on Achievement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1937940
- The paper
- Datcher, L. (1982). Effects of Community and Family Background on Achievement. The Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.