The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Dung and Carrion Beetle Communities in Central Amazonia
Abstract
This study, one of the first to document the effects of forest fragmentation on insects in the tropics, showed that dung and carrion beetle communities in 1—ha and 10—ha forest fragments differed from those in contiguous forest, even though the fragments had been isolated by <350 m for an ecologically short time (2—6 yr). During 288 pitfall trap days at the Minimum Critical Size of Ecosystems study site 80 km north of Manaus, Brazil, I captured 55 species in 15 genera. Trap days were divided equally between three 1—ha, three 10—ha, three clear—cut, and three contiguous forest areas. Pitfall samples from clear—cut areas separating forest fragments from intact forest indicated that beetles rarely moved from intact forest into fragments. The apparent barrier imposed by clearcuts diminished with the invasion of second growth. Except for the four species in the genus Glaphyrocanthon, all species were found more frequently in forested areas than in clearcuts. Glaphyrocanthon constituted 97% of the 717 individuals captured in clearcuts and was never captured in contiguous forest or 10—ha fragments. Forest fragments had fewer species, sparser populations, and smaller beetles than comparable intact forest areas. The changes in dung and carrion beetle communities help explain the low rates at which dung decomposed in 1—ha fragments. Thus, forest fragmentation not only changes the dung and carrion beetle fauna; its effects ramify through other related community and ecosystem processes, as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems
Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. D., Lovejoy, T. E., Sexton, J. O., Austin, M. P., Collins, C. D., et al. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500052 · Cited by 4,773
Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review
SAUNDERS, D. A., HOBBS, R. J., & MARGULES, C. R. (1991) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x · Cited by 4,110
“Consequences ofFragmentation 21 and invertebrate numbers and activity (Klein 1989; Parker 1989), on litter decomposition, and on soil moisture retention.”
BackgroundEcosystem Decay of Amazonian Forest Fragments: a 22‐Year Investigation
Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L., Bruna, E. M., Didham, R. K., Stouffer, P. C., Gascon, C., Bierregaard, R. O., Laurance, S. G., & Sampaio, E. (2002) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x · Cited by 1,847
Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning
Larsen, T. H., Williams, N. M., & Kremen, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00749.x · Cited by 695
Use of Amazonian Forest Fragments by Understory Insectivorous Birds
Stouffer, P. C., & Bierregaard, R. O. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265818 · Cited by 609
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, B. C.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1715-1725
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084168382
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Dung and Carrion Beetle Communities in Central Amazonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938106
- The paper
- Klein, B. C. (1989). Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Dung and Carrion Beetle Communities in Central Amazonia. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.