The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prey Control by an Assemblage of Generalist Predators: Spiders in Garden Test Systems
Abstract
The hypothesis that generalist predators limit associated prey populations was tested using spiders, a group classically thought to be an insignificant component of the agroecosystem. Two habitat manipulations (addition of mulch and flowers) in separate and combined treatments were utilized to enhance spider numbers in a mixed vegetable system. Compared to control plots, significantly higher spider densities were observed in the plots to which mulch alone or both mulch and flowers had been added. Insect damage to the plants was significantly lower in the plots to which mulch had been added as well, which correlates with the lower numbers of pest insects in plots containing mulch. That spiders were the probable cause of the effect was demonstrated in plots containing both mulch and flowers but from which spiders had been systematically removed. Removing spiders from plots with mulch and flowers removed the effect of this treatment on pest numbers and plant damage. In addition, 84% of the predators observed foraging in the study areas during timed watches were spiders and 98% of the predation events observed were by spiders. In a separate experiment, spiders were added to a subset of individually bagged broccoli plants that had been infested previously with known numbers of herbivorous pests. Plant damage in bags lacking spiders averaged 93.3%, whereas damage averaged 31.8% in bags to which spiders had been added.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture
Landis, D. A., Wratten, S. D., & Gurr, G. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175 · Cited by 3,100
Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Hättenschwiler, S., Tiunov, A. V., & Scheu, S. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932 · Cited by 1,674
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Can Generalist Predators be Effective Biocontrol Agents?
Symondson, W. O. C., Sunderland, K. D., & Greenstone, M. H. (2002) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145240 · Cited by 1,535
Wardle, D. A. (1995) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60065-3 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Riechert, S. E., & Bishop, L.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1441-1450
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1982340889
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prey Control by an Assemblage of Generalist Predators: Spiders in Garden Test Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938281
- The paper
- Riechert, S. E., & Bishop, L. (1990). Prey Control by an Assemblage of Generalist Predators: Spiders in Garden Test Systems. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.