The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dispersal of Misteltoes by Honeyeaters and Flowerpeckers: Components of Seed Dispersal Quality
Abstract
The quality of the seed dispersal performed by a dispersal agent has two components. Disperser efficiency is the probability that a seed dispersed by the vector will lodge in a safe site and germinate. Disperser effectiveness is the proportion of seedlings in a population that any one seed vector is responsible for disseminating. Two birds, the Spiny—cheeked Honeyeater (Acanthagenys rufogularis) and the Mistletoebird (Dicaeum hirundinaceum), dispersed the seeds of the host—specific mistletoe Amyema quandang in arid western myall (Acadia papyrocarpa) woodland in South Australia. The Mistletoebird dispersed the mistletoe's seeds by defecating and depositing seeds in a string on the perch, with the majority of seeds being dispersed to branches between 5 and 10 mm in diameter. Honeyeater—dispersed seeds usually fell onto substrates below the defacting bird or were wiped onto a convenient branch, generating a bimodal distribution in the branch sizes to which seeds were dispersed. Mistletoebirds and honeyeaters were similarly efficient in dispersing seeds to the thin (1—6 mm diameter) western myall stems most susceptible to infection (0.9—1.2% of all seeds dispersed, respectively), but Mistletoebirds dispersed four times as many seeds as honeyeaters to the whole range of stem diameters infected (1—16 mm). Germination of mistletoe seeds and seedling growth did not differ significantly in the seeds dispersed by the two birds species across the main fruiting season, but Mistletoebird—dispersed seeds had higher viability and grew more strongly at the start of the season when ripe fruit was scarce. Disperser effectiveness was measured by locating and classifying recently disseminated Amyema quandang seedlings in western myall canopies as Mistletoebird or honeyeater dispersed on the basis of species—specific differences in the stools of the two birds. Honeyeaters had dispersed most of the older (>2 mo) seedlings to live myall branches in three trees, suggesting that they were the more effective disperser of A. quandang. The system is a good model for resolving problems in the ecology of seed dispersal, which are intractable with most terrestrial plant species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecosystem Services Provided by Birds
Whelan, C. J., Wenny, D. G., & Marquis, R. J. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1439.003 · Cited by 988
Jordano, P. (2000) · Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities · doi:10.1079/9780851994321.0125 · Cited by 848
Quantity, quality and the effectiveness of seed dispersal by animals
Schupp, E. W. (1993) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00052209 · Cited by 664
SILVA, S. I., BOZINOVIC, F., & JAKSIC, F. M. (2005) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01449.x · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Reid, N.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-145
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2338065078
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispersal of Misteltoes by Honeyeaters and Flowerpeckers: Components of Seed Dispersal Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938420
- The paper
- Reid, N. (1989). Dispersal of Misteltoes by Honeyeaters and Flowerpeckers: Components of Seed Dispersal Quality. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.