The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitrogen‐Limited Growth in Plants from Different Successional Stages
Abstract
The effect of nitrogen availability on the plant growth was studied using nine plant species, some of which are commonly found in recently abandoned old fields while others are more characteristic of native prairie. Each species was grown by itself in nine different soil mixtures in which total soil nitrogen (as N) per unit soil mass ranged from 20 to 850 mg/kg, spanning the range of total soil nitrogen observed in a chronosequence of old fields at Cedar Creek Natural History Area, Minnesota. For each species there was a significant (P < 0.5), positive correlation between the biomass attained after 12 wk of growth and the total soil nitrogen. These data allowed the species to be ranked, from those that attained the greatest biomass as seedling at low nitrogen levels to those that attained the least, as follows: Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Achillea millefolium, Chenopodium album, Agropyron repens, Agrostis scabra, Poa pratensis, Sorghastrum nutans, Schizachyrium scoparium, and Liatris aspera. There was a highly significant tendency for early successional species to grow more rapidly at low nitrogen levels and to acquire more nitrogen per plant from nitrogen—poor soils than late successional species. However, late successional species did not grow more rapidly at high nitrogen levels than early successional species. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that early successional species are dominant following old field abandonment at Cedar Creek because of their ability to compete for soil nitrogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman
CRAINE, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01043.x · Cited by 634
Futile transmembrane NH 4 + cycling: A cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants
Britto, D. T., Siddiqi, M. Y., Glass, A. D. M., & Kronzucker, H. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034698 · Cited by 555
Plant-soil Interactions in Temperate Grasslands
Burke, I. C., Lauenroth, W. K., Vinton, M. A., Hook, P. B., Kelly, R. H., Epstein, H. E., Aguiar, M. R., Robles, M. D., Aguilera, M. O., Murphy, K. L., et al. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005987807596 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Tilman, D.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-04
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 555-563
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W1967419913
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen‐Limited Growth in Plants from Different Successional Stages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938598
- The paper
- Tilman, D. (1986). Nitrogen‐Limited Growth in Plants from Different Successional Stages. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.