The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Invasion of Polygyne Fire Ants Decimates Native Ants and Disrupts Arthropod Community
Abstract
The fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren invaded southeastern United States from South America >50 yr ago. Urban and agricultural consequences of this invasion are well documented; however, ecological effects are still poorly understood. Increasing frequencies of p olygyne or multiple—queen fire ants in Texas and other areas of the Southeast are disturbing because nest densities of this new form are often ten times as great as those of the more familiar monogyne form. We studied the ecological impacts of a polygyne fire ant invasion on ants and other surface—active arthropods at a field station in central Texas. Arthropod abundance and species richness were assessed using a combination of baits, pitfall traps, and litter samples. This invasion decimated the indigenous ant fauna. Competitive replacement appears to be the primary mechanism behind this effect. Species richness of ants in infested areas dropped by 70%, while the total number of native individuals dropped by 90%. Of 35 species of ants collected in this study, 23 were either significantly less common or absent from infested sites; only S. invicta was more common at infested sites. The most dramatic effect of the invasion was a 10—30 fold increase in the total number of ants at infested sites–of which >99% were the imported fire ant S. invicta. The impact of this invasion on other surface—active arthropods was less severe, but still substantial. The abundance of isopods, erythraeid mites, and tumblebug scarabs declined significantly, while the abundance of ground crickets, a brachypterous roach, and a symbiotic scarab increased significantly. Overall, the species richness of non—ant arthropods was 30% lower in infested sites, and individual numbers were 75% lower. Total arthropod species richness (including ants) was 40% less at infested sites. These data indicate that polygyne fire ants pose a substantial threat to the biodiversity of native arthropod communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolutionary genetics of invasive species
Lee, C. E. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02554-5 · Cited by 1,771
Original Articles: Ecological Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale
Peterson, G., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900002 · Cited by 1,547
Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions
Strayer, D. L., Eviner, V. T., Jeschke, J. M., & Pace, M. L. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.007 · Cited by 1,025
Ecological effects of invasive alien insects
Kenis, M., Auger-Rozenberg, M.-A., Roques, A., Timms, L., Péré, C., Cock, M. J. W., Settele, J., Augustin, S., & Lopez-Vaamonde, C. (2009) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-008-9318-y · Cited by 750
How Risky is Biological Control?
Simberloff, D., & Stiling, P. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265693 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, S. D., & Savignano, D. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2095-2106
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2001454735
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invasion of Polygyne Fire Ants Decimates Native Ants and Disrupts Arthropod Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938623
- The paper
- Porter, S. D., & Savignano, D. A. (1990). Invasion of Polygyne Fire Ants Decimates Native Ants and Disrupts Arthropod Community. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938623
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.