The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ecosystem Alteation of Boreal Forest Streams by Beaver (Castor Canadensis)
Abstract
Beaver (Castor canadensis) alter the structure and dynamics of aquatic ecosystems with a minimum of direct energy or nutrient transfer. Through dam building and feeding activities, beaver act as a keystone species to alter hydrology, channel geomorphology, biogeochemical pathways, and community productivity. Here we consider the effects of beaver activity on several major ecosystem components and processes in boreal forest drainage networks in Quebec, Canada. The density of dams on the small streams (≤4th order) we studied average 10.6 dams/km; the streams retain up to 6500 m3 of sediment per dam, and the wetted surface area of the channel is increased up to several hundred—fold. Beaver are also active in large order streams (≥5th order), but their effects are most noticeable along riverbanks and in floodplains. Comparative carbon budgets per unit area for a riffle on 2nd order Beaver Creek and a beaver pond downstream show the pond receives only 42% of the carbon acquired by the riffle annually. However, because the pond has a surface area seven times greater than the riffle, it receives nearly twice as much carbon as the riffle per unit of channel length. Carbon in the pond has an estimated turnover time of °161 yr compared to ° 24yr for the riffle. Beaver ponds are important sites for organic matter processing; the stream metabolism index (SMI), a measure of ecosystem efficiency for the utilization or storage of organic inputs, is 1.63 for the pond compared to 0.30 for the riffle; the turnover length (S) for particulate carbon is 1.2 km for the pond compared to 8.0 km for the riffle. Beaver—induced alterations to the structure and function of streams suggest removal of beaver prior to 1900 AD had substantial effects on the dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Our results suggest that current concepts of the organization and diversity of unaltered stream ecosystems in North America should recognize the keystone role of beaver, as drainage networks with beaver are substantially different in their biogeochemical economies than those without beaver.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones
Naiman, R. J., & Décamps, H. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621 · Cited by 2,791
Self-citationPolis, G. A., Anderson, W. B., & Holt, R. D. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.289 · Cited by 2,362
Challenges in the Quest for Keystones
Power, M. E., Tilman, D., Estes, J. A., Menge, B. A., Bond, W. J., Mills, L. S., Daily, G., Castilla, J. C., Lubchenco, J., & Paine, R. T. (1996) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312990 · Cited by 2,018
The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation.
Mills, L. S., & Doak, D. F. (1993) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312122 · Cited by 1,306
Wolves and the Ecology of Fear: Can Predation Risk Structure Ecosystems?
RIPPLE, W. J., & BESCHTA, R. L. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0755:wateof]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 813
Metadata
- Authors
- Naiman, R. J., Melillo, J. M., & Hobbie, J. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1254-1269
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001071680
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecosystem Alteation of Boreal Forest Streams by Beaver (Castor Canadensis). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938681
- The paper
- Naiman, R. J., Melillo, J. M., & Hobbie, J. E. (1986). Ecosystem Alteation of Boreal Forest Streams by Beaver (Castor Canadensis). Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.