The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sediment-Related Mechanisms of Growth Limitation in Submersed Macrophytes
Abstract
Myriophyllum spicatum L. and Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle grown on 40 different sediments from 17 geographically widespread North American lakes indicated 10— and 20—fold declines in growth with increasing sediment organic matter up to a concentration of °20% dry sediment mass. Poor growth was obtained also on inorganic sediments with a sand fraction exceeding 75% dry sediment mass. Diminished growth on organic sediments occurred at low values of sediment density, and on sands, at high values of sediment density. Differential centrifugation of organic sediment, facilitating an increase in sediment density with no change in organic matter content, stimulated Hydrilla growth, indicating that sediment density rather than organic matter content was most influential in regulating growth. Macrophyte growth and nutrient mass accumulation in shoots were closely correlated, but essentially unrelated to concentrations of nutrients in shoots. The magnitude (r value) and statistical significance of correlations between nutrients in macrophyte shoots and sediments varied appreciably, depending on the form of shoot nutrient data (concentration or accumulation), and the type (interstitial water or total), and basis (mass or volume) of sediment nutrient data. Growth and nutrient accumulation were highly correlated with sediment nutrient concentrations based on volume, indicating interrelationships among growth, nutrition, and sediment density. Additions of P and Fe in combination to organic sediments with N supplied in the overlying solution resulted in significant growth increases in Hydrilla, suggesting that diminished growth on unfavorable sediments was caused by multiple nutrient limitation. Nutrient uptake on low—density organic sediments was apparently limited by long diffusion distances. Limited rates of nutrient diffusion and exchange in coarse—textured sediments, in addition to low nutrient status, may have contributed to their poor ability to support macrophyte growth. Thus, mechanisms of growth limitation on both sands and organic sediments appear to involve nutrition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains
AMOROS, C., & BORNETTE, G. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00905.x · Cited by 961
The interaction between water movement, sediment dynamics and submersed macrophytes
Madsen, J. D., Chambers, P. A., James, W. F., Koch, E. W., & Westlake, D. F. (2001) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/a:1017520800568 · Cited by 911
Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review
Bornette, G., & Puijalon, S. (2011) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-010-0162-7 · Cited by 849
Allelopathy of Aquatic Autotrophs
Gross, E. M. (2003) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/713610859 · Cited by 659
Herbivory on freshwater macrophytes
Lodge, D. M. (1991) · Aquatic Botany · doi:10.1016/0304-3770(91)90044-6 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Barko, J. W., & Smart, R. M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1328-1340
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026859267
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sediment-Related Mechanisms of Growth Limitation in Submersed Macrophytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938689
- The paper
- Barko, J. W., & Smart, R. M. (1986). Sediment-Related Mechanisms of Growth Limitation in Submersed Macrophytes. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.