Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 702

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Role of Tannins in Defending Plants Against Ruminants: Reduction in Protein Availability

Robbins, C. T., Hanley, T. A., Hagerman, A. E., Hjeljord, O., Baker, D. L., Schwartz, C. C., Mautz, W. W.·1987·Ecology

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that tannins defend plants against large herbivores by decreasing protein availability. Digestion trials were conducted with mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and results from previous trials with white—tailed deer (O. virginianus), moose (Alces alces), caribou/reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), and elk (Cervus elaphus) were summarized to evaluate dietary factors affecting protein availability. The digestibility of plant protein in feeds with minimal tannins, such as grasses and agriculturally produced legumes and grains, was a highly predictable function of the total protein content and the amount of nondigestible, fiber—bound protein. Digestible protein in plants containing significant tannins was lower than predicted from regressions for low—tannin feeds. The reduction in digestible protein was proportional to the protein—precipitating capacity of the plant tannins. Deciduous browse stems collected in winter had very low levels of protein—precipitating tannins and only a slightly lower protein availability than predicted. Tannins are not important in the defense of most deciduous tree shrub stems consumed by these herbivores. Tannins in flowers and forb, tree, and shrub leaves markedly reduced protein availability. Tannins must be considered in understanding the defensive strategies of leaves and flowers. Voluntary intake of the high—phenolic forages was significantly reduced below ingestion rates for grasses, legumes, and pelleted diets. It is hypothesized that soluble phenolics that do not inhibit digestion but are absorbed and reduced intake through their toxicity are more important in defending some plant parts against ruminants than are digestion—reducing tannins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1938809

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 702

Metadata

Authors
Robbins, C. T., Hanley, T. A., Hagerman, A. E., Hjeljord, O., Baker, D. L., Schwartz, C. C., & Mautz, W. W.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-02
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
98-107
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2318146714
Cited by
702
References
0
FWCI
43.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Tannins in Defending Plants Against Ruminants: Reduction in Protein Availability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938809
The paper
Robbins, C. T., Hanley, T. A., Hagerman, A. E., Hjeljord, O., Baker, D. L., Schwartz, C. C., & Mautz, W. W. (1987). Role of Tannins in Defending Plants Against Ruminants: Reduction in Protein Availability. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938809

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.