The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of Tannins in Defending Plants Against Ruminants: Reduction in Protein Availability
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that tannins defend plants against large herbivores by decreasing protein availability. Digestion trials were conducted with mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and results from previous trials with white—tailed deer (O. virginianus), moose (Alces alces), caribou/reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), and elk (Cervus elaphus) were summarized to evaluate dietary factors affecting protein availability. The digestibility of plant protein in feeds with minimal tannins, such as grasses and agriculturally produced legumes and grains, was a highly predictable function of the total protein content and the amount of nondigestible, fiber—bound protein. Digestible protein in plants containing significant tannins was lower than predicted from regressions for low—tannin feeds. The reduction in digestible protein was proportional to the protein—precipitating capacity of the plant tannins. Deciduous browse stems collected in winter had very low levels of protein—precipitating tannins and only a slightly lower protein availability than predicted. Tannins are not important in the defense of most deciduous tree shrub stems consumed by these herbivores. Tannins in flowers and forb, tree, and shrub leaves markedly reduced protein availability. Tannins must be considered in understanding the defensive strategies of leaves and flowers. Voluntary intake of the high—phenolic forages was significantly reduced below ingestion rates for grasses, legumes, and pelleted diets. It is hypothesized that soluble phenolics that do not inhibit digestion but are absorbed and reduced intake through their toxicity are more important in defending some plant parts against ruminants than are digestion—reducing tannins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modification of Ecosystems by Ungulates
Hobbs, N. T. (1996) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802368 · Cited by 1,016
Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health
Mueller‐Harvey, I. (2006) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2577 · Cited by 965
Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity
Provenza, F. D., Villalba, J. J., Dziba, L. E., Atwood, S. B., & Banner, R. E. (2003) · Small Ruminant Research · doi:10.1016/s0921-4488(03)00143-3 · Cited by 561
Hanley, T. A. (1997) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546006 · Cited by 186
Self-citationSchoof, N., & Luick, R. (2018) · Oxford Bibliographies in Ecology · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0207 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Robbins, C. T., Hanley, T. A., Hagerman, A. E., Hjeljord, O., Baker, D. L., Schwartz, C. C., & Mautz, W. W.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-107
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2318146714
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Tannins in Defending Plants Against Ruminants: Reduction in Protein Availability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938809
- The paper
- Robbins, C. T., Hanley, T. A., Hagerman, A. E., Hjeljord, O., Baker, D. L., Schwartz, C. C., & Mautz, W. W. (1987). Role of Tannins in Defending Plants Against Ruminants: Reduction in Protein Availability. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938809
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.