The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing Great Tit Clutch Size in a Fluctuating Environment
Abstract
Great Tits (Parus major) nesting Wytham Wood near Oxford, England, lay clutches averaging 8.53 eggs, although the most productive clutch size is 12. We evaluated various mechanisms that have been suggested to account for this apparent disparity, including (1) cost of reproduction, (2) Mountford's "cliff—edge effect," and (3) year—to—year environmental variability. Data on 4489 clutches, including 603 manipulated clutches, from the past 24 yr, offer weak or contradictory support for the first two mechanism. There are marked annual environmental fluctuations, and a geometric mean estimate of relative fitness best predicts the observed mean clutch size. Years that are poor for survival of young affect individuals laying layer larger clutches much more than they affect those laying smaller clutches. This "bad—years effect" reduces the mean and increases the variance in fitness for individuals laying large clutches more than it does for individuals laying smaller clutches. Hence it is more advantageous, in the long term, for birds to lay clutches smaller than the most productive clutch size. The cost of reproduction as it affects adult survival is neither necessary nor sufficient for clutch size optimization in Great Tits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas
Stearns, S. C. (1976) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409052 · Cited by 3,557
Cited by
Ellis (2009) · doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7 · Cited by 1,592
Dijkstra, C., Bult, A., Bijlsma, S., Daan, S., Meijer, T., & Zijlstra, M. (1990) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5172 · Cited by 451
Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations
Merilä, J., Sheldon, B. C., & Kruuk, L. E. B. (2001) · Genetica · doi:10.1023/a:1013391806317 · Cited by 435
Wright, J., Bolstad, G. H., Araya‐Ajoy, Y. G., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12451 · Cited by 175
(2002) · Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyce, M. S., & Perrins, C. M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-153
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2150620348
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing Great Tit Clutch Size in a Fluctuating Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938814
- The paper
- Boyce, M. S., & Perrins, C. M. (1987). Optimizing Great Tit Clutch Size in a Fluctuating Environment. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938814
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.