The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fluxes of Dissolved Organic Nutrients and Humic Substances in a Deciduous Forest
Abstract
We evaluated the importance of dissolved organic matter as a vehicle for the movement of N and P from the canopy and the forest floor into the mineral soil of a deciduous forest. We also examined the origin and nature of dissolved organic matter from the forest floor to see whether it was simply soluble plant material or highly humidified matter. The average annual output from the forest floor in the form of dissolved organic matter was 18, 28, and 14% of the input in solid litterfall for C, N, and P, respectively. In throughfall, about half of the dissolved N and P was organic. But, in solution percolating from the forest floor, 94% of the N and 64% of the P was organic. Leaching from the forest floor was not a source of inorganic N and P for the mineral soil. Instead, the forest floor was a sink for the removal of these inorganic nutrients delivered in throughfall. Microbial immobilization was the most likely explanation for much of the inorganic nutrient removal. In contrast, the forest floor was an abundant contributor of N and P to the mineral soil in the form of dissolved, and possibly particulate, organic matter. Much of the dissolved organic matter entering the A horizon originated from the upper (Oa and Oe horizon) forest floor, but it was modified in several respects compared to the original soluble material. The solution percolating from the forest floor over most of the year was much richer in nitrogen, contained a much larger proportion of hydrophilic acids, and contained a much smaller proportion of carbohydrate—rich hydrophilic neutrals, than did the original water—extractable material in autumn litter. However, the fresh autumn litter did contain a similar proportion of soluble hydrophobic acids that resembled dissolved humic substances in several respects. Most of the flux of nitrogen from the forest floor to the A horizon was carried by humic substances and highly colored hydrophilic acids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haynes, R. J. (2005) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(04)85005-3 · Cited by 1,010
Dissolved Organic Carbon in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Synthesis and a Model
Neff, J. C., & Asner, G. P. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100210000058 · Cited by 734
A mechanism of abiotic immobilization of nitrate in forest ecosystems: the ferrous wheel hypothesis
Davidson, E. A., Chorover, J., & Dail, D. B. (2003) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00592.x · Cited by 333
Soil carbon dynamics after forest harvest: An ecosystem paradigm reconsidered
Yanai, R. D., Currie, W. S., & Goodale, C. L. (2003) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-002-0206-5 · Cited by 318
In situ denitrification of septic-system nitrate using reactive porous media barriers: field trials
Robertson, W. D., & Cherry, J. A. (1995) · Groundwater · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1995.tb00266.x · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Qualls, R. G., Haines, B. L., & Swank, W. T.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 254-266
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2166121390
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fluxes of Dissolved Organic Nutrients and Humic Substances in a Deciduous Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938919
- The paper
- Qualls, R. G., Haines, B. L., & Swank, W. T. (1991). Fluxes of Dissolved Organic Nutrients and Humic Substances in a Deciduous Forest. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.