The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental Evaluation of Predator‐Prey Relationships in a Patchy Environment: Consequences For Habitat Use Patterns in Minnows
Abstract
An experimental study, using the minnows Semotilus atromaculatus and Rhinichthys atratulus, was conducted in a seminatural artificial stream to evaluate the interaction of predator presence, habitat structural complexity, and time of day in determining habitat use patterns of prey. Predators were adult S. atromaculatus, while juveniles of both species were used as prey. Prey of both species actively avoid locations in the artificial stream that contain predators. However, structural complexity and time of day each have a mediating effect on the response of the prey fish to the presence of predators. While others have shown differential survivorship of prey, dependent upon structural complexity and time of day, this study shows how prey respond behaviorally to the presence of predators in habitat patches. They are most likely to enter those patches during daylight or when structure is present. In natural headwater streams prey fish are often found in patches of high predator density where prey density is often correlated with the degree of structural complexity. Our findings offer an explanation for this variability in relative abundances of predators and prey, by relating patch use by prey habitat structural complexity and diel activity. Resulting implications for optimal foraging and guild organization are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Habitat Selection Under Predation Hazard: Test of a Model with Foraging Minnows
Gilliam, J. F., & Fraser, D. F. (1987) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939877 · Cited by 869
Self-citationGrazing Minnows, Piscivorous Bass, and Stream Algae: Dynamics of a Strong Interaction
Power, M. E., Matthews, W. J., & Stewart, A. J. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938007 · Cited by 687
A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts
Lazzaro, X. (1987) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/bf00008764 · Cited by 565
Towards a Unifield Foraging Theory
Mangel, M., & Clark, C. W. (1986) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938669 · Cited by 542
Effects of seasonality and fish movement on tropical river food webs
Winemiller, K. O., & Jepsen, D. B. (1998) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb01032.x · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser, D. F., & Cerri, R. D.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-313
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2089606063
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Evaluation of Predator‐Prey Relationships in a Patchy Environment: Consequences For Habitat Use Patterns in Minnows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1938947
- The paper
- Fraser, D. F., & Cerri, R. D. (1982). Experimental Evaluation of Predator‐Prey Relationships in a Patchy Environment: Consequences For Habitat Use Patterns in Minnows. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.