The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Plant Density and Diversity on the Population Dynamics of a Specialist Herbivore, the Striped Cucumber Beetle, Acalymma Vittata (Fab)
Abstract
To determine the effects of plant density and diversity on the population dynamics of a specialist herbivore, the striped cucumber beetle (Acalymma vittata [Fab.]), cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.) were planted in monocultures and in polycultures with corn (Zea mays L.) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.).Population densities of A. vittata and its insect predators, as well as cucumber growth, survivorship, and reproduction were monitored in these experimental plots. By controlling total plant density, host plant density, and plant diversity, it was possible to distinguish the effects of these three confounding variables. Densities of A. vittata were 10–30 times greater in monocultures than in polycultures, both per plot and per plant, even when total plant density and host plant density were held constant. The lack of any effect of plant density on per—plot beetle abundances emphasized the importance of diversity per se in influencing beetle populations. These differences in beetle abundance caused by diversity resulted from differences in tenure time and movement patterns among plots, rather than from differences in colonization, reproduction, or predation. In mark—recapture studies, a greater proportion of beetles marked in monocultures than in polycultures was later found, and of those marked in monocultures, a greater number were later found in monocultures than in polycultures. All measures of growth (leaf area, growth rate, and vine length) and reproduction (fruit production and number of flowers) of Cucumis sativus were most strongly affected by diversity, but also were affected by plant density. Both per—plot and per—plant values were greater in monocultures than in polycultures. The number of beetles was strongly correlated with the total amount of plant growth and reproduction in monocultures but not in polycultures. For plots with equal amounts of leaf area, monocultures had an order of magnitude greater number of beetles; thus, differences in host plant quantity did not explain the differences in beetle abundances between monocultures and polycultures. Numbers of beetles were much more strongly related to total plot characteristics than individual plant characteristics. Although defoliation was negligible, beetles significantly decreased cucumber survivorship and longevity by disseminating bacterial wilt disease (Erwinia tracheiphila [E. F. Sm.]).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Luginbill, P., & McNeal, F. H. (1958) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/51.6.804 · Cited by 36
Cited by
Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity
Huston, M. A. (1997) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050180 · Cited by 1,772
Metadata
- Authors
- Bach, C. E.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1515-1530
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2065646937
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Plant Density and Diversity on the Population Dynamics of a Specialist Herbivore, the Striped Cucumber Beetle, Acalymma Vittata (Fab). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939058
- The paper
- Bach, C. E. (1980). Effects of Plant Density and Diversity on the Population Dynamics of a Specialist Herbivore, the Striped Cucumber Beetle, Acalymma Vittata (Fab). Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.