Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Amphibian Larvae on Primary Production, Nutrient Flux, and Competition in a Pond Ecosystem

Seale, Dianne B.·1980·Ecology

Abstract

In a pond ecosystem near St. Louis, Missouri, natural variations in tadpole biomass during 1971—1972 were accompanied by shifts in patterns of nutrient cycling and primary production, particularly when metamorphoses caused abrupt removal of these transient consumers. In the field, increased tadpole biomass was associated with: (1) reduced standing crop of suspended particles, including phytoplankton, the tadpoles' major food source; (2) a shift in the state of nitrogen from largely particulate to largely dissolved; (3) reduced rates of primary production, from both H 14 CO 3 uptake and diurnal oxygen methods; (4) a nonliner effect on phytoplankton specific growth rates; (5) a shift in phytoplankton community structure away from filamentous blue—green algae; and (6) a reduced proportion of active chlorophyll @a in the photosynthetic pigments of phytoplankton. From laboratory experiments, the potential impact of tadpoles on nitrogen flux, through feeding and nutrient release, was estimated. Several conclusions were made: (1) Suspensions feeding by tadpoles reduced concentrations of suspended particles. Under conditions of low particles: high tadpoles, the specific growth rates of tadpoles reduced. Recruitment was absent except under conditions of high particles: low tadpoles; the most diverse community of new tadpole recruits (four species) was observed under such conditions. All four species (three genera) had similarly sized particles in their guts. These field observations are consistent with an hypothesis of competition among the tadpoles. (2) Tadpoles apparently were regulatory consumers; they became a large component with respect to phytoplankton. Nitrogen flux through tadpoles was within the same order of magnitude, and sometimes exceeded the estimated N uptake by phytoplankton. (3) Tadpoles probably regulated primary production by both reducing standing crop and altering specific growth rates of algae. At maximum tadpole biomass, suspended particle concentrations were stabilized near the laboratory—determined threshold concentration for feeding by these Rana tadpoles. When metamorphosis removed these transient consumers, rates of primary production increased dramatically. (4) Interactions within the pond ecosystem apparently determined aquatic—terrestrial nutrient balances for the amphibian communities. Some species deposited more nutrient in their eggs than was assimilated by larvae, but the community as a whole extracted nutrient from the ecosystem. Nutrient input in eggs was much less than that assimilated by autotrophs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1939059

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Seale, D. B.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-12
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
1531-1550
ISSN
  • 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9170
OpenAlex
W2163484660
Cited by
236
References
1
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Amphibian Larvae on Primary Production, Nutrient Flux, and Competition in a Pond Ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939059
The paper
Seale, D. B. (1980). Influence of Amphibian Larvae on Primary Production, Nutrient Flux, and Competition in a Pond Ecosystem. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939059

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.