The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Ants and An Ant‐Tended Herbivore on Seed Production Of a Neotropical Herb
Abstract
This study examined a complex interaction among species, focused on (1) a neotropical perennial plant, Calathea ovandensis (Marantaceae), that produces extrafloral nectar, (2) ants that visit the nectaries, (3) an ant—tended specialist herbivore, Eurybia elvina (Lepidoptera: Riodiniadae), that feeds on buds, flowers, and fruits, and (4) other herbivores of reproductive tissues. We experimentally investigated: (1) to what extent seed production was influenced by ants and herbivores, and (2) whether spatial variation in seed production was influenced by spatial variation in the ant community. The lowest seed production (x = 6) was for inflorescences with Eurybia but without ants. Highest seed production (x = 21) was for inflorescences with ants, but without Eurybia. In the presence of ants, Eurybia lowered mean seed production by 33%. In the absence of ants, Eurybia lowered mean seed production by 66%. The eight ant species differed greatly in the magnitude of their beneficial effects on seed production. Ants were not equally distributed over sites, and spatial hetrogeneity in seed production by Calathea reflected differences in ant communities among sites. We concluded that variation and interdependence of various components of plant—animal interactions are likely to result in variation in the magnitude of their beneficial or detrimental impact on plants. Such variation should be incorporated into plant demograpic models as spatially varying alternate life history paths to yield insight into the evolutionary impact of plant—animal interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trophic Cascades in Terrestrial Systems: A Review of the Effects of Carnivore Removals on Plants
Schmitz, O. J., Hambäck, P. A., & Beckerman, A. P. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303311 · Cited by 981
Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory
McCall, A. C., & Irwin, R. E. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00975.x · Cited by 478
Variation Among Floral Visitors in Pollination Ability: A Precondition for Mutualism Specialization
Schemske, D. W., & Horvitz, C. C. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.225.4661.519 · Cited by 451
Self-citationBlüthgen, N., E. Stork, N., & Fiedler, K. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12687.x · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Horvitz, C. C., & Schemske, D. W.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1369-1378
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2014678516
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Ants and An Ant‐Tended Herbivore on Seed Production Of a Neotropical Herb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939117
- The paper
- Horvitz, C. C., & Schemske, D. W. (1984). Effects of Ants and An Ant‐Tended Herbivore on Seed Production Of a Neotropical Herb. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.