The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Succession and Nutrient Dynamics Following Forest Cutting and Burning in Amazonia
Abstract
Plant establishment, plant mortality, vegetation productivity, nutrient accumulation, and nutrient leaching were studied during the first 5 yr of succesion following the cutting and burning of a forest plot in the upper Rio Negro region of the Amazon Basin. The speed and vigor of forest regeneration following disturbance of this type provide a measure of the recuperative potential of this ecosystem. The study plot (0.09 ha) was dominated by forbs during the 1st yr and then by the pioneer tree species Cecropia ficifolia Snethlage during year two. Tree mortality exceeded establishment during the 3rd yr because of C. ficifolia trees died nearly in unison. During the 4th yr, tree density increased sharply as successional and forest tree species grew in the space vacated by C. ficifolia. The canopy was dominated at that time by the pioneer species Vismia japurensis Reich. and Vismia lauriformis (Lam.) Choisy. By the 5th yr, all establishment space had apparently been preempted: there were only 0.07 new establishments/m 2 during year five, while 95% of the trees present at the end of year four survived through the 5th yr. There were 56 tree species (@<2 m tall) present on the site after 5 yr. More than half of these were primary forest species. Primary forest species were most common in the understory. These trees averaged >1 m in growth height each year and should eventually grow into the canopy. Hence, it appears that most individuals that will participate in the aggrading phase of forest development were already present on the site within 5 yr of burning. Biomass was only 66 g/m 2 at the end of the 1st yr, but °1000 g/m 2 were added in each subsequent year. The standing crop of biomass (shoot and root) at 5 yr was 4840 g/m 2, a value 16% that of the mature forest which occupied the site prior to cutting. Approximately 27% of the dead trunk and branch biomass from the pre—existing forest remained on the site after 5 yr. Litter production increased each year from 39 g/m 2 (year one) to 825 g/m 2 (year five) and tended to be inversely related to rainfall. Total aboveground production was highest for the 5th yr (1940 g/m 2) and was probably close to a maximum for the site. Total live—plant nutrient stocks after 5 yr, as a percentage of the precut forest stocks, were 15% for N, 23% for P, 39% for K, 48% for Ca, and 45% for Mg. A large increase in the leachate concentrations of K, Mg, and NO 3 occurred during the first 2 yr following burning. By the 5th yr, concentrations were not significantly different from those in the undisturbed forest. After 5 yr soil nutrient levels were also similar to those of the preburn forest. Overall, nutrient losses apparently were not great enough to destroy the site's ability to return eventually to a state similar to that which existed prior to disturbance. This does not mean that a more severe treatment, such as conversion of forest to pasture, would not affect the regrowth ability of a site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lehmann, J., Pereira da Silva, J., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Zech, W., & Glaser, B. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1022833116184 · Cited by 1,878
Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics
Guariguata, M. R., & Ostertag, R. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00535-1 · Cited by 1,380
Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances
Chazdon, R. L. (2003) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1078/1433-8319-00042 · Cited by 1,122
FIRE EFFECTS ON NITROGEN POOLS AND DYNAMICS IN TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS: A META-ANALYSIS
Wan, S., Hui, D., & Luo, Y. (2001) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1349:feonpa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 616
Silver, W. L., Neff, J., McGroddy, M., Veldkamp, E., Keller, M., & Cosme, R. (2000) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100210000019 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Uhl, C., & Jordan, C. F.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-10
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1476-1490
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2084739546
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Succession and Nutrient Dynamics Following Forest Cutting and Burning in Amazonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939128
- The paper
- Uhl, C., & Jordan, C. F. (1984). Succession and Nutrient Dynamics Following Forest Cutting and Burning in Amazonia. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.