The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Litterfall, Nutrient Cycling, and Nutrient Limitation in Tropical Forests
Abstract
Patterns of nitrogen, phosphorus, and calcium cycling through litterfall were evaluated using published information from 62 tropical forests. In general, lowland tropical forests have more nitrogen and lower dry mass/nitrogen ratios in litterfall than most temperate forests, while nitrogen return in montane tropical forests is comparable to that in temperate forests. Calcium return is also high in most tropical forests studied, but many tropical forests (lowland and montane) have little phosphorus return and very high dry mass/phosphorus ratios in litterfall compared to most temperate forests. Phosphorus appears to be cycled highly efficiently in such forests. Fine litterfall in the range of tropical forests studied was predicted from climate, and the residuals of this regression were positively correlated with phosphorus but not nitrogen concentrations in litterfall. The amount of fine litterfall (uncorrected for climate) was also significantly correlated with phosphorus concentrations in moist and wet lowland tropical forests. These analyses suggest that phosphorus but not nitrogen availability limits litterfall in a substantial subset of intact tropical forests. Sites on old oxisols and ultisols, especially those in Amazonia, appear to be particularly low in available phosphorus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100
Sala, O. E., Stuart Chapin, F., III, Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 · Cited by 9,280
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Tilman, D. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995 · Cited by 1,406
Stehfest, E., & Bouwman, L. (2006) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7 · Cited by 991
Testing a Conceptual Model of Soil Emissions of Nitrous and Nitric Oxides
DAVIDSON, E. A., KELLER, M., ERICKSON, H. E., VERCHOT, L. V., & VELDKAMP, E. (2000) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0667:tacmos]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 975
Metadata
- Authors
- Vitousek, P. M.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 285-298
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2069903502
- Cited by
- 1,471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Litterfall, Nutrient Cycling, and Nutrient Limitation in Tropical Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939481
- The paper
- Vitousek, P. M. (1984). Litterfall, Nutrient Cycling, and Nutrient Limitation in Tropical Forests. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939481
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.