The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Light‐Limited Growth and Competition for Light in Well‐Mixed Aquatic Environments: An Elementary Model
Open accessAbstract
Light is never distributed homogeneously since it forms a gradient over biomass. As a consequence, the common theories on nutrient competition are not applicable to competition for light. In this paper, we investigate a model for light—limited growth and competition among phytoplankton species in a mixed water column. The model is based on standard assumptions such as Lambert—Beer's law of light absorption, a Monod equation for carbon uptake, and constant specific carbon losses. By introducing the concept of quantum return, we show that the dynamics of growth and competition can be quantified not only in terms of depth but also directly in terms of light availability. We argued that the crucial measure for phytoplankton growth is not a "critical depth" but a "critical light intensity," I*out. For each species, I*out corresponds to the equilibrium light intensity at the bottom of a water column when the species is grown in monoculture. I*out plays a role similar to the "critical nutrient concentration" R* used in models of nutrient—limited growth. For a constant light supply, the species with the lowest I*out will competitively exclude all other species. There are, however, some important differences between R* and I*out. Whereas R* reflects both the local and the total balance between nutrient uptake and nutrient losses, I*out only reflects the total carbon balance. Moreover, I*out decreases with increasing light supply, whereas R* is independent of the nutrient supply. As a consequence, (1) the outcome of competition for light may depend on the light supply, (2) the compensation point is not a good predictor for the outcome of competition, (3) the resource ratio hypothesis does not apply when species compete for both nutrients and light. The outcome of competition for nutrients and light may depend on the nutrient and light supply, on the mixing depth, and on the background turbidity due to inanimate substances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trait-Based Community Ecology of Phytoplankton
Litchman, E., & Klausmeier, C. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173549 · Cited by 1,290
Williams, P. J. L. B., & Laurens, L. M. L. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/b924978h · Cited by 1,223
Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos
Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46540 · Cited by 1,016
Self-citationON THE DOMINANCE OF FILAMENTOUS CYANOBACTERIA IN SHALLOW, TURBID LAKES
Scheffer, M., Rinaldi, S., Gragnani, A., Mur, L. R., & van Nes, E. H. (1997) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0272:otdofc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 555
Bernard, O. (2011) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.07.012 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 507-520
- ISSN
- 0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-9170
- OpenAlex
- W2149229904
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light‐Limited Growth and Competition for Light in Well‐Mixed Aquatic Environments: An Elementary Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1939554
- The paper
- Huisman, J., & Weissing, F. J. (1994). Light‐Limited Growth and Competition for Light in Well‐Mixed Aquatic Environments: An Elementary Model. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.